(The Genetics Group was disbanded in 2006)
On 25 September 1996 the profession participated in a joint discussion meeting with the Royal Society on Human genetics - uncertainties and the financial implications ahead. A record of the discussion was published by the Royal Society in Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences Volume 352 (27 August 1997).
The actuarial content of the document was published as a paper for the Institute Sessional Meeting held on 19 May 1997: Human genetics and financial services (Wilkie, Daykin, Le Grys, Macdonald, and Ross). In addition, John (J) Lockyer, Chairman of the Life Board's Genetics Working Party, agreed that a 'first rough draft' of a paper being produced by his working party could be made available to those attending the Sessional Meeting. At the Sessional Meeting, Peter Turvey suggested the establishment of an inter-professional forum to debate the issues further (this suggestion was subsequently taken up - see below).
During 1997 both the ABI and the Human Genetics Advisory Commission (HGAC) were active on the issue of genetic testing and insurance, and the profession contributed to the debate by commenting on the work of both organisations. In parallel with its contribution to the ABI and HGAC, the profession also drafted its own genetics 'position statement' to assist spokespersons in the event of a request for comment from the media; the statement was not formally published. The work of the ABI and the HGAC resulted in the publication in December 1997 of two documents:
In mid 1997 a meeting of interested parties (Geoff Brown, Desmond Le Grys, Robin Snelson and Peter Turvey) considered further Peter Turvey's suggestion for a forum. In late 1997 the Wider Fields Board took ownership of the work being done by this group and established a formal working party. After publication of the HGAC report it became clear that this document provided an ideal spring-board for a forum, since it called for increased collaboration between geneticists, clinicians, actuaries and others, and for "widespread consultation between the various groups involved in this very complex area". The HGAC report became, therefore, the focus for the Working Party's thinking. The Forum Working Party continued to meet during 1998, Chris Daykin becoming its Chairman in February.
A final version of the Life Board Working Party's paper was published for the International Congress of Actuaries in June 1998 as Genetic Science and its Implications for Life Insurance (Lockyer (J), Brett, Hannington, Lockyer (JAN), Macdonald and Woods).
Following informal consultation with key players during 1998, a formal meeting to discuss the concept of a 'Genetics and Insurance Forum' was held on 27 November. In view of the considerable support expressed at the meeting for the profession's initiative, it was decided to establish the forum (UK Forum for Genetics and Insurance) immediately without further consultation. The TOR for the Forum are as follows:
In the run up to the establishment of the forum, it became clear to the Wider Fields Board that, in order for the profession to contribute effectively to the Forum, it should develop a greater expertise in the field of genetics and a better understanding of the relationship between genetics and insurance. Therefore, it set itself an objective for 1998/99 to establish a cross-Board working party to develop such an expertise.
In his Presidential address in October 1998, Paul Thornton said " Advances in the field of genetics will prove to be among the most far-reaching developments of the 20th Century. In the grand scheme of things they will have a profound effect on the demographic aspects of our work. Our focus has so far been limited to the implications of for insurance underwriting. We now need to devote more research to working with other disciplines on how these advances will impact on health provision, longevity and long-term care requirements.
At a subsequent meeting of the Faculty and Institute Management Committee in November 1998, FIMC noted that Chris Daykin had agreed to chair a working party to develop the profession's involvement in the field of genetics. FIMC requested that the Terms of Reference for the working party be widely drawn so as to lead to consideration of the implications of genetic testing for all areas of actuarial activity.
In July 2000 the Wider Fields Board was disestablished and replaced by two new Boards, one being the Social Policy Board (SPB). The Working Party has been renamed the Genetics Group and reports to the SPB. David Paul is the Group's representative on the Board.
Genetics and insurance
Genetic research
Bioethics, and public education
Government sponsored sites
General scientific/medical research