The Education Committee of the Faculty and Institute of Actuaries carries out research into the study support provided by employers to their employees who are preparing for the actuarial examinations.
As a result of this research the Education Committee has drawn up the following guidance on good practice in relation to the support given by employers to students.
Internal mentoring arrangements, where a qualified actuary supervises and supports a student's studies, can be extremely useful. However, if such systems are to achieve their full potential the actuary must give sufficient time and effort.
Most employers rely on outside sources of tuition and only in a few companies is internal tuition provided. Employers should discuss with their students whether there is a need for and ability to provide internal tuition either as a separate entity or as part of a mentoring arrangement.
Employers should discuss with each student the order in which the examinations will be attempted and the number that will be taken at any one time. This is to ensure that the students are working at the right pace for them as individuals and are not being over- or under-stretched. The decision on how many subjects a student should actually sit should take into account other commitments both in and out of the workplace. Such discussions could form part of a mentoring scheme.
It is common for study leave to be reduced following repeated examination failure. However, employers should consider giving a reasonable level of support to students who have only failed an examination once, and are retaking the subject. Some limited support might be offered to other students retaking examinations.
Employers should try to ensure that consistent policies are adopted across different departments within their organisation.
The actual amount of time each student needs to spend on a particular subject will vary from student to student. Quality of study time is far more important than quantity of study time. However, the following guidelines are suggested:
| Core Technical Subjects (CT1-CT8) | between 125 and 150 hours depending on the subject and an individual student's past educational background in the subject. |
| Business Awareness Module (CT9) | 25 hours plus two-day course |
| Core Applications Concepts (CA1) | 400 hours |
| Modelling (CA2) | 20 hours (this assumes that some of the preparation for this module forms part of Work-based skills) plus two-day course |
| Communications (CA3) | 50 hours |
| Specialist Technical subjects | 200 hours |
| Specialist Applications | 300 hours |
| Specialist Applications subjects, taken with UK Practice Modules |
320 hours |
It is therefore suggested that a reasonable workload for any one study session from September to April might be:
The study session from May to September is shorter and so it may be difficult for a student to study at the same rate during this time. A student who studies every session with no failures could be expected to attain Fellowship within three years.
Employers can also help students by guiding their choice of examinations to sit in order that they take them in an appropriate order. While there is no formal requirement relating to the order in which the examinations are taken, it is recommended that the Core Technical subjects are at least studied (even if not passed) before a student attempts the Core Applications, Specialist Technical and Specialist Applications subjects. These later subjects build upon the material taught in the Core Technical stage.
A practical approach will be expected from candidates in all subjects. While evidence of practical experience may help the candidate it will not be demanded, but breadth of knowledge and evidence of judgement are to be expected of candidates taking the Specialist Applications subjects.
Employers should bear in mind that some students may have disabilities which require them to be shown special consideration when planning their study support. Such students should be advised the Faculty and Institute will make special facilities available for students with disabilities such as RSI, dyslexia, sight impairment, long term injury etc. They will be required to produce medical evidence the first time they require special facilities, and refer to it at any subsequent examination sittings. The Faculty and Institute reserve the right to request further medical information at appropriate intervals.
Employers should show an active interest in their students' progress and should encourage a positive approach to the examinations. Moral support should be offered to students along with financial support. Students tend to perform better in a culture where both students and employers expect success.
Most employers link pay increases to both examination success and an assessment of performance in the office. Employers should bear in mind that good performance in one area may be at the expense of the other.