You are here

Bye-Laws and Rules

General meeting

A general meeting of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA) was held electronically on Wednesday 20 December 2017 at 12 noon GMT and the following motions were put to the meeting:

Motions from the Council of the IFoA proposing changes to the Bye-laws and Rules:

1. Scottish Board

The Resolution to amend Bye-law 23 was passed by a simple majority of members entitled to vote and voting at the general meeting (in accordance with paragraph 14 of the Charter). This is subject to such changes as the Privy Council may require and which are agreed by the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries.

We will now apply to the Privy Council’s for approval to amend Bye-law 23 to read as follows:

 “The members of the Council elected by the Scottish constituency shall be members of a Scottish Board, which shall report to the management body.  The members of the Council elected by the Scottish constituency may co-opt as many other persons as they consider appropriate to serve on the Scottish Board.  Each year the members of the Scottish Board shall elect a person from among their number to chair their meetings, but no person who at that time is President shall be eligible for election as the person to chair the Scottish Board.  The role of and other arrangements for the Scottish Board may be prescribed in the Regulations.”

Once we receive the approval of the Privy Council to amend Bye-law 23 we will publish the consequential changes to the Regulations on the website for 28 days before they take effect.  If during that period, more than 50 members raise formal objections to the amended Regulations, Council will re-consider the amendments. In none are received we expect that the Bye-law and Regulations will be in force by the end of March 2018.

2. Changes to the Disciplinary Scheme – Independent Examiner

A Resolution to make the amendments to the Disciplinary Scheme, as shown in red font in Appendix 1, was passed by a simple majority of members entitled to vote and voting at the general meeting (in accordance with Bye-law 27).

3. Changes to the Disciplinary Scheme – Appeals Process

A Resolution to make the amendments to the Disciplinary Scheme, as shown in blue font in Appendix 1, was passed by a simple majority of members entitled to vote and voting at the general meeting (in accordance with Bye-law 27).

4. Capacity for Membership Scheme

A Resolution to amend the Disciplinary Scheme, as shown in red font in Appendix 2, to introduce a new process to deal appropriately and more compassionately with regulatory conduct issues where the root cause is a member’s ill health, was passed by a simple majority of members entitled to vote and voting at the general meeting (in accordance with Bye-law 27).

The process will be called the Capacity for Membership Scheme. 

It is proposed that the Capacity for Membership Scheme Rules is woven into the Disciplinary Scheme Rules, which results in a re-numbering of the Rules.  It is for that reason that the amendments at Appendix 2 appear substantial.  No material changes are, however, being made as a result to the Disciplinary Scheme Rules itself. 

To assist members, a summary of the Capacity for Membership Scheme Rules is included at Appendix 3

The changes to the Rules in motions 2, 3 and 4 above have been voted for by a majority of our members and will take effect from the date of their publication on the website.  We anticipate this will be on 1 February 2018.

Queries

If you have any queries about the proposed changes to the Bye-laws and Rules, please contact: the IFoA’s Corporate Secretary at James Harrigan.

Related documents

Contact Details

James Harrigan, Corporate Secretary

James.Harrigan@actuaries.org.uk

I will try to respond to email queries within five working days.

Filter or search events

Start date
E.g., 04/03/2021
End date
E.g., 04/03/2021

Events calendar

  • Finance in the Public Interest Series

    16 March 2021 - 23 March 2021

    Spaces available

    There is widening debate that many of our social, financial and regulatory institutions need to be rethought so that we can create more sustainable futures, particularly in light of the Covid-19 pandemic, the policy/macro-economic response to the pandemic and how it affects consumers, as well as the impending climate crisis. This multi-day series of three keynote webinars, individually presented by leading economist John Kay, Sir Paul Collier, Professor of Economics and Public Policy at the Blavatnik School of Government, Ashok Gupta, Chair at Mercer Ltd, and Nico Aspinall, Chief Investment Officer at B&CE, will open up discussion on these essential topics. The series will culminate in a panel session with Chief Economist of the Bank of England, Andy Haldane.

  • The price is righter

    16 March 2021

    Spaces available

    This webinar provides an overview of the state of the UK protection market, and how different insurers are using different levels of sophistication to price (such as using customer demand models). It considers how insurers have implemented these sophisticated pricing techniques, and the practical challenges they have faced.

  • Spaces available

    This discussion will revolve around the latest industry developments including and introduction to Part VII transfers and Schemes of Arrangement (process, parties involved and recent events), insights and lessons from recent with-profits transactions and restructurings (including Equitable Life and Pru-Rothesay), how firms can apply these learnings to future arrangements, and the outlook for future with-profits transactions and restructurings (including the impacts of Covid-19 and Brexit)

     

  • Spaces available

    What is stewardship and how has the landscape changed under the 2020 UK Stewardship Code? How does effective stewardship create long term value for beneficiaries and what roles do asset owners and asset managers play in active stewardship. This webinar will offer answers to these questions in a practical approach to stewardship reporting.

  • Spaces available

    Mis-estimation risk is a key element of demographic risk, and past work has focused on mis-estimation risk on a run-off basis.  However, this does not meet the requirements of regulatory regimes like Solvency II, which demands that capital requirements are set through the prism of a finite horizon like one year.  This paper presents a value-at-risk approach to mis-estimation risk suitable for Solvency II work.