The Institute and Faculty of Actuaries is commissioning a research project on the topic of how employer covenants are best taken into account when assessing the capital supporting Institutions of Occupational Retirement Provision (IORPs).
The impetus for this project is provided by the review of the IORP directive and in particular by the Holistic Balance Sheet (HBS) option. This was described in the consultation document issued on 25 November 2011 by the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) in its draft advice to the European Commission.
The rationale for the project is to further the understanding of the issues surrounding, and the practicalities of expressing, 'reliance on employer covenant' as a single figure in a HBS.
The project should also examine what information relating to the assessment of covenant is already accessible to trustees. This should include information on how intangible assets are valued in balance sheets such as brand, goodwill etc.
We envisage that a member of the Profession will work closely with the successful applicants to facilitate access to relevant information and contacts and to ensure that the questions addressed are relevant to the review of the IORP directive.
Questions to address in the research
- What are the desirable qualities of a covenant assessment methodology for the purpose of managing and regulating an IORP?
- How could the frequency of covenant assessments/monitoring be optimised?
- What are the key features (including pros and cons) of the different approaches that are currently used and that might be adopted in future? In particular:
- to what extent do they possess the desirable qualities?
- what are the implications for standard setters?
- how can they be adapted tobe proportionate for small scheme and small sponsoring entities?
- what are the potential implications for compliance costs?
- How do ratings agencies use the publicly available data in company accounts to assess and rate company debt?
- What additional information do lenders seek and how do they assess how much to lend?
- What additional information, over and above that used to assess debt, would be needed to assess the security of a company’s pension promise bearing in mind the typical differences in term between these obligations?
- Are there intrinsic differences between the employer covenant per se, and the value of the covenant that is available to the pension scheme and if so, can they be identified and measured?
- How do companies assess their own financial strength? (For example how is enterprise value established in merger and acquisition work?) How do analysts assess the impact of a DB pension scheme/liability on the value of i) the equity and ii) the debt of acompany? Does this offer any insights into how an employer covenant could be valued for the purpose of financing pension schemes?
- What potential areas of conflict with accounting principles are there in valuing the covenant?
- What extra issues arise in groups of companies and multinationals (i.e. when companies have option to move funds across jurisdictions)?
- Are there useful lessons to be learned from the work going on for IFRS4 in insurance accounting?
- Do other countries have data sources and processes that it would be useful to replicate in the UK for the purpose of covenant assessment?
If you have any questions or wish to discuss any aspect of our funding for member-led research please contact the Research and Knowledge Team:
Filter or search events
As part of the ARC Webinar Series 2021, this webinar will review the work of the UEA/Aviva research team over the last four years on a major research programme funded by the IFoA’s Actuarial Research Centre.
Climate change poses a significant threat across many regions and sectors, and businesses. Insurers and asset managers, must play a role in ensuring transparency around climate related risks and opportunities.
Whilst insurers have been performing stress and scenario testing for many years, in the last 12 months the PRA has increased its focus on the ability to identify, measure and increase financial and operational resilience.
There is widening debate that many of our social, financial and regulatory institutions need to be rethought so that we can create more sustainable futures, particularly in light of the Covid-19 pandemic, the policy/macro-economic response to the pandemic and how it affects consumers, as well as the impending climate crisis. This multi-day series of three keynote webinars, individually presented by leading economist John Kay, Sir Paul Collier, Professor of Economics and Public Policy at the Blavatnik School of Government, Ashok Gupta, Chair at Mercer Ltd, and Nico Aspinall, Chief Investment Officer at B&CE, will open up discussion on these essential topics. The series will culminate in a panel session with Chief Economist of the Bank of England, Andy Haldane.
This webinar provides an overview of the state of the UK protection market, and how different insurers are using different levels of sophistication to price (such as using customer demand models). It considers how insurers have implemented these sophisticated pricing techniques, and the practical challenges they have faced.
This discussion will revolve around the latest industry developments including and introduction to Part VII transfers and Schemes of Arrangement (process, parties involved and recent events), insights and lessons from recent with-profits transactions and restructurings (including Equitable Life and Pru-Rothesay), how firms can apply these learnings to future arrangements, and the outlook for future with-profits transactions and restructurings (including the impacts of Covid-19 and Brexit)
What is stewardship and how has the landscape changed under the 2020 UK Stewardship Code? How does effective stewardship create long term value for beneficiaries and what roles do asset owners and asset managers play in active stewardship. This webinar will offer answers to these questions in a practical approach to stewardship reporting.
Dr Catherine Donnelly will present the basics of the structures for pooling longevity risks and summarise recent research results in this area in addition to outlinging future research around this topic. This is work under a research programme funded by the IFoA's Actuarial Research Centre, called 'Minimizing longevity and investment risk while optimising future pension plans'.
Mis-estimation risk is a key element of demographic risk, and past work has focused on mis-estimation risk on a run-off basis. However, this does not meet the requirements of regulatory regimes like Solvency II, which demands that capital requirements are set through the prism of a finite horizon like one year. This paper presents a value-at-risk approach to mis-estimation risk suitable for Solvency II work.