The 2014 GIROC survey (GIROC UK Reserving Survey 2014) highlighted the wide differences in approaches to measuring and communicating uncertainty in reserves that are currently employed in the UK and identified that this was an area the profession would benefit from focusing on.
The MUQ working party was set up in the wake of this finding and has undertaken work in two stages.
Stage 1 - Bringing together work that has been done before
Stage 1 was carried out in 2015 and focused on reviewing the various qualitative methods already employed. This work has brought together information on current market practice (both in the UK and around the world) and previous research into one place - please see the reference materials section below.
- A01: A Tried and Tested Framework for Reserve Uncertainty - GIRO 2015 - Insight into a reserve uncertainty framework in practice, presented by James Widdows of Chaucer.
- C10: Measuring Uncertainty Beyond Bootstrap - MUQ Working Party Findings
- Reserving Seminar 2015 - A look at how a reserve uncertainty framework has been developed in Australia
- CIGI 2015 - A look at how a reserve uncertainty framework has been developed in Australia.
Stage 2 - Development of a reserve uncertainty framework
Stage 2 commenced in 2016 and used the Stage 1 research to propose ideas for how the measurement of reserve uncertainty could be moved forward in the UK. As a result, the MUQ working party has proposed a framework for assessing uncertainty beyond statistical techniques.
The purpose of this framework is to provide actuaries with a best practice approach for thinking about aspects of uncertainty that are not covered by quantitative factors such as percentiles. This will enable actuaries to take a wider view of uncertainty and identify qualitative issues that may be missed in a purely quantitative approach. It has been developed with a focus on reserving uncertainty, but the principles could be applied to many other areas of actuarial work.
Feedback from members of the profession is encouraged to help develop the framework further. Please send feedback to email@example.com
- GIRO 2018: Workshop A: Reserve Uncertainty Framework: Linking Reserve Risk to Reserving
- Reserving Seminar 2016
- GIRO 2016
- GIRO 2019: C3 Allowing for Qualitative Risk: Reserving and Capital Collide
For further information, including additional reading, resources on individual framework elements and ideas on how to deal with specific elements of uncertainty, please the ‘Reference Materials’ section below.
- Experience from other countries
- Additional resources for framework elements
- Additional useful resources
- A framework for assessing risk margins
- A framework for Estimating Uncertainty in Insurance Claims Costs
- Data uncertainty matrix - The Forest of Brocéliande has a Knowledge Quality Assessment module, which provides an uncertainty matrix. This can serve as a high-level qualitative register for data uncertainties in a model and was used to inform the MUQ framework.
- IAN on data for "CP73" – guidance from the Society of Actuaries in Ireland on questions a Signing Actuary could ask to help form a view on whether data used for providing a Statement of Actuarial Opinion is sufficiently accurate, complete and appropriate.
- S&P GI ERM Rating Criteria – pages 22-25 cover risk controls assessment from a general insurance perspective, where the extent (or level of detail) that this is in place may cause additional (or lower) degree of uncertainty on the reserves.
Language used in communicating uncertainties:
- The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has various types of reports on climate change demonstrating good use of language: IPCC_summary-for-policymakers
- Expert judgement elicitation
- Dr Joseph Lo, Dr Ed Tredger and Bernadette Hlavka discuss the tricks and possible pitfalls when conducting a successful expert judgment elicitation meeting, Article from The Actuary, 2013
- Uncertain factors surrounding expert judgements: Expert Judgement WP, 2015
- Expert judgement process has long been in use in actuarial work, but it has lacked transparency. This paper aims to provide a practical framework regarding expert judgement processes, and how those processes may be validated.
- ‘Ersatz model tests’ – Presented at the 2016 reserving seminar, it looks at ways of testing stochastic models, with an aim to developing deeper understanding of when and why different models are more or less appropriate.
Effectiveness of methods working party
- Methods beyond ‘bootstrap’ - These slides that were presented by the working party at GIRO 2015 contain detailed references to further reading on alternative methods to bootstrap.
- Use of capital models
- 2014 GIROC UK Reserve Survey
- Quantification and reporting of uncertainty for general insurance reserving - Contains suggested standard vocabulary for communicating uncertainty in GI reserving
- A change agenda for reserving. Report of the General Insurance Reserving Issues Taskforce (GRIT) (2006) – recommendations on how actuaries can improve the way in which reserving is done in general insurance.
- 31 May 2018
- 9 November 2017
You might also like
If you want more information about this research working party please contact the Communities Team.
Filter or search events
Cancer incidence and mortality vary by region and socioeconomic status. Modelling the structure development and trends of cancer risk is important for insurance purposes and can impact pricing and reserving in related health insurance fields such as critical illness insurance and care provision.
A panel discussion with investment representatives discussing the impact of investment on climate change and vice versa.
This event is part of The Road to Glasgow: IFoA’s Sustainability Thought Leadership Series which will provide a platform for prominent contributors so that our members and others can understand the perspectives of a wide range of parties interested in the climate debate.
Climate change is one of the greatest risks facing our world today. Addressing it will require multi-faceted solutions. Through this panel session, we will explore the different levers that can be used to meet net-zero targets including climate science and data, government engagement, and mobilising green finance.
How governments and societies collectively respond to the climate crisis is increasingly being analysed through the lens of intergenerational fairness. Our expert panel will assess and explore the extent to which inter-generous fairness is being considered in climate policies, the lessons from those countries who are leading the way on fairness and justice in climate interventions, and more.
This practical course is aimed at actuaries at any stage of their career who want to develop their own growth mindset and apply it to their work setting and personal or professional lifelong learning. The content of the course builds on the lecture given by Dr Helen Wright on Growth Mindset as part of the President’s 2021 Lecture series, and will be delivered over a period of 2 months, from mid-October to early December.
The climate crisis and the degradation of our planet will affect societies everywhere. How we address these threats will require solutions that transcend borders. As a global profession, the actuarial community is well-placed to consider and propose effective risk management solutions to help manage the climate crisis.
Content will be aimed at all actuaries looking to understand the issues surrounding mental health in insurance and in particular those looking to ensure products and processes widen access for, and are most useful to, those experiencing periods of poor mental health.