Effectiveness of ERM frameworks

Code: Risk1

Lead: Jasvir Grewal

Detail:

  • How well have the existing ERM frameworks coped with the pandemic? Did they operate as expected?
  • What can we learn from the experience of Covid-19 with a view to improving ERM frameworks?
  • Were all implications of the pandemic (financial and operational) sufficiently covered by the framework?
  • Were roles and responsibilities sufficiently clear?
  • Were processes circumvented and if so, was there appropriate governance?
  • In general terms, was the ORSA, including prior scenario testing and business continuity planning helpful in managing through the crisis?
  • Is there any information in the soon-to-be-published SFCRs that might help with the research?
  • Are there new risks that need to be incorporated into the ERM framework?

Outputs: pending

Great Risk Transfer

Code: Risk2

Lead: Peter Telford

Detail: What impact will the pandemic have on the Great Risk Transfer? Will it accelerate the transfer of risk to individuals or will it highlight the need for a return to more pooling and centralisation of risk, away from individuals? Is there a need for a pandemic equivalent of Flood Re, for example? Are there any generational issues, with some losing out relative to others, as a result of decisions taken in respect of Covid-19? It’s likely that the impacts on the Great Risk Transfer will emerge over the coming months (and maybe longer) so there is value in the volunteers tracking developments.

(The "Great Risk Transfer" is an IFoA initiative for 2020 looking at the consequences of the transfer of financial risks from government, financial services providers and employers onto individuals)

Outputs: pending

Scenario Modelling

Code: Risk3

Lead: Maryam Abdullah

Detail

  • What scenarios have companies been modelling during the pandemic?
  • How will this impact the suite of scenarios that are modelled going forward?
  • The research should look across Life, Pensions & GI areas
  • It should also consider and capture broader issues, such as societal impacts, the effect of changing government policy etc, to be as comprehensive as possible.

Outputs:

  • Covid-19 Scenario Modelling: Healthcare Sector Scenarios 
    This paper presents some of the parameters that can be used for pandemic scenarios. However, modelling might require time-dependent variables for some of the scenarios. This paper proposes 5 possible stress scenarios using the following parameters. By Ritu Kotnala, June 2021.

  • Mauritius non-life industry 2020 analysis 
    This article analyses the impact of Covid-19 on the Mauritius non-life industry. An analysis of the environment of Mauritius is first presented followed by a high-level analysis of the industry results and finally looking at other key considerations for insurers over the next years. By Darshan Purmessur, November 2021.

Cyber security

Code: Risk4

Lead: Hazel McNeilage

Detail

  • What cyber-related issues have arisen as a result of the pandemic?
  • How much of this was predictable and were companies adequately prepared?
  • What needs to be improved going forward?

Note that this idea does not include the impact on cyber insurance, which the RM Board believes is best captured through the GI practice area.

Outputs: pending

Blue Sky Thinking – What does a transformed post-Covid-19 society look like?

Code: Risk6

Lead: Geoff Chaplin

Detail: A think tank research activity to think through what the “new normal” might look like and hence some of the possible broader implications of Covid-19. For example, what is the impact of people more routinely working from home? Are there broader lessons that can be learned and on which the IFoA can contribute?  This might lend itself well to link in with the IFoA’s Wider Fields activities.

Outputs: pending

Events calendar

No results found.