This saving commitment is long term in nature and, moreover, very few members elect actively to switch assets (other than within a lifestyle programme). Despite these features virtually 100% of DC saving is in liquid, daily tradable asset classes. Classical economics tells us that all these DC savers are in effect paying a premium to be in liquid assets (or foregoing an illiquidity premium). Why?
Anecdotally it is said that short-termism and poorly designed remuneration structures in the equity market arguably still reward corporates for focusing only on short-term returns and share buy-backs, thus reducing capital investment in future growth. There is an acknowledged shortage of long term investment capital. How can DC products be structured to encourage true long-term capital investment – assuming this would be a desirable development?
This is a cross practice working party that will be managed by the DC advisory committee of the Pensions Board and will work with the Finance and Investment and the Resource and Environment Board to consider these and associated issues. Specifically, we would like to address the following related questions: Is sacrificing the illiquidity premium on DC savings a problem at the level of either the individual, company or societal level? If so, what are the consequences? What barriers exist to enabling true long-term capital investment in the DC context? What product(s) might work in concept to facilitate such savings? What changes and incentives may be required?
- 9 November 2017
You might also like
For more information about Pensions working parties contact the Communities Team.
Filter or search events
Cancer incidence and mortality vary by region and socioeconomic status. Modelling the structure development and trends of cancer risk is important for insurance purposes and can impact pricing and reserving in related health insurance fields such as critical illness insurance and care provision.
A panel discussion with investment representatives discussing the impact of investment on climate change and vice versa.
This event is part of The Road to Glasgow: IFoA’s Sustainability Thought Leadership Series which will provide a platform for prominent contributors so that our members and others can understand the perspectives of a wide range of parties interested in the climate debate.
Climate change is one of the greatest risks facing our world today. Addressing it will require multi-faceted solutions. Through this panel session, we will explore the different levers that can be used to meet net-zero targets including climate science and data, government engagement, and mobilising green finance.
How governments and societies collectively respond to the climate crisis is increasingly being analysed through the lens of intergenerational fairness. Our expert panel will assess and explore the extent to which inter-generous fairness is being considered in climate policies, the lessons from those countries who are leading the way on fairness and justice in climate interventions, and more.
This practical course is aimed at actuaries at any stage of their career who want to develop their own growth mindset and apply it to their work setting and personal or professional lifelong learning. The content of the course builds on the lecture given by Dr Helen Wright on Growth Mindset as part of the President’s 2021 Lecture series, and will be delivered over a period of 2 months, from mid-October to early December.
The climate crisis and the degradation of our planet will affect societies everywhere. How we address these threats will require solutions that transcend borders. As a global profession, the actuarial community is well-placed to consider and propose effective risk management solutions to help manage the climate crisis.
Content will be aimed at all actuaries looking to understand the issues surrounding mental health in insurance and in particular those looking to ensure products and processes widen access for, and are most useful to, those experiencing periods of poor mental health.