The inquiry was – and remains - a real opportunity for the IFoA to influence this debate. The IFoA submitted a comprehensive written response on 11 November; a copy of it can be found here: IFoA response. A number of Practice Boards were heavily involved in putting it together, including the Life and General Insurance Boards, as well as the Retrospective on Solvency II Working Party, amongst others. Our thanks go to all the Boards, Committees, Working Parties and individual members who contributed to this important debate.
The TSC published a number of the written responses they received, and we have produced a summary of a selection of these responses. Note that the summary is based on our own interpretation of these written submissions: IFoA Summary.
IFoA Oral Evidence
Following our written evidence, the TSC invited the IFoA to provide supplementary oral evidence. Andrew Chamberlain, Chair of the Life Board, gave evidence on behalf of the IFoA on 17 January 2017, together with representatives from PWC and KPMG.
Themes explored by the TSC at this meeting included the suitability of SII for the UK market, whether the PRA should have competition as a primary objective, and the wider impact of measures such as the Matching and Volatility Adjustments and the Risk Margin. Our evidence focussed on the impact of SII from a public interest perspective, including the balance between policyholder security and policyholder value for money. The meeting went well and the TSC were left with a clear idea of some of the impacts of SII and potential solutions to address them. A video of this session can be found here – IFoA/TSC video - and the corresponding IFoA/ TSC transcript.
We followed-up on our appearance with a brief letter summarising some of the issues/ potential changes which could be made to SII in the UK: Summary of SII Changes.
TSC Sessional Event
The week after our attendance at the TSC, we held the first ever dual-site live sessional event in the IFoA’s history. The event drew together IFoA working parties at Staple Inn and Edinburgh on 23 January, and featured a live video feed between both sites and on-site presentation and discussion.
The sessional meeting started with a debrief from Andrew Chamberlain on our evidence to the TSC, including the wider context to the Committee. There then followed updates from two Working Parties relevant to the themes of the TSC inquiry (Retrospective on Solvency II and Transitional Measure on Technical Provisions). The event closed with a Q&A session live from both sites.
The meeting was a success, and the IFoA hopes to replicate this dual-site model in the future. Our thanks go to Andrew Chamberlain, the two sessional Chairs and both Working Parties for presenting on the night. A video of the sessional meeting will be added to this site when available.
The TSC is a particularly influential committee, and Government departments, notably HM Treasury, are likely to consider carefully what the TSC have to say. We will be monitoring developments with the TSC carefully, and hope to have further IFoA input on the ongoing evolution of insurance regulation in the UK.
We will update this page as the debate progress.
|IFoA summary and analysis - TSC Solvency II Inquiry||31 January 2017|
|Insurance industry evidence to the Treasury Select Committee Solvency II Inquiry:||25 January 2017|
|Summary of Solvency II changes||17 January 2017|
|IFoA evidence to the Treasury Select Committee Solvency II Inquiry:||17 January 2017|
|IFoA response to TSC Solvency II Inquiry||11 November 2016|
You might also like
IFoA, 7th Floor, Holborn Gate, 326 – 330 High Holborn, WC1V 7PP
Filter or search events
This year's GIRO has been re-designed as a virtual conference to offer members and non-members the opportunity to get up to date content from leading experts in the general insurance field via online webinars. All sessions will be recorded and made available to purchase and re-watch post-event on the IFoA's GI Online Learning Resource area.
This webinar will provide an update on the emerging thinking around future regulation of DB schemes:
The webinar will discuss the challenges and opportunities schemes face in evaluating end game options, choosing a target state and understanding the impact this strategic decision could have on member outcomes long after the “end state” is reached. Adolfo, Kevin and Rhian bring over 60 years of experience in the industry and a variety of perspectives as scheme actuary, covenant adviser, trustee, de-risking adviser and insurer.
Retail banking is going through a period of substantial change as it moves into the digital age. Banks have large amounts of data about their customers and about their risks. Open data application programming interface (APIs) and data science are enabling banks to use their data to offer innovative and sometimes personalised services. Data science is also adding value in risk areas such as fraud detection and cyber security. At the same time, the move to online banking is making it easier for firms including fintechs to enter banking without having to establish branch networks.
Cash-flow driven investing is a game-changer for DB pension funds navigating their end-game. Suitable for sponsors who want to reduce risks on their balance sheets. And for trustees, it shifts the focus to providing greater certainty of returns, managing funding level volatility and ensuring they have enough income to pay cash-flow requirements.
Patrick Kennedy, Partner at Gateley Legal and Founding Director of Entrust (a leading professional pensions trustee company), will be delivering an update on the latest legal developments during the course of 2020. With both a pensions legal perspective and over 25 years of trustee service, Patrick will seek to highlight how the letter of the law has continued to evolve against the backdrop of a difficult and challenging year
The talk will provide an understanding of the priorities and relationships between deficit reduction contributions, in the context of wider scheme funding, and different types of value outflow from the employer based on the working party’s recently published report.
Covid-19 has required an urgent and cross-practice initiative to facilitate the extensive impact this pandemic has across all industries. IFoA members have been keen to contribute in a different way, so we developed the IFoA Covid-19 Action Taskforce [ICAT] to coordinate our effort, with a more efficient governance.
We have over 500 volunteers and countless topics which we have amalgamated into 93 workstreams.