Final report of the Great Risk Transfer
At the start of 2020 the IFoA launched its campaign on what we termed the ‘Great Risk Transfer’. Throughout the year we explored the trend to transfer risks from institutions – such as employers, the state, and financial services providers – to individuals.
Evidence of this shift exists in a number of areas of public policy and actuarial work. It amounts to a profound change in the way that individuals organise their life and finances, and represents one of the most significant yet little understood social, financial, and political challenges of our time.
While it is true that levels of numeracy, financial literacy, and understanding of risk are generally low, even many of those who consider themselves more financially aware feel ill-equipped to deal with the risks they now face.
Our work suggests that the causes of this trend are complex and cover a variety of factors, including increasing longevity, technological advances, the low interest-rate environment, and changes in financial regulation. We believe there is an urgent need for practical solutions, exacerbated by the pandemic, as individuals are confronted by the need to manage risks they did not have to worry about previously.
Between February and May last year we ran a call for evidence so that we could gather first-hand examples of this transfer and the ways it was impacting on the public. This evidence then informed subsequent roundtables, from which we developed the suggested solutions into practical recommendations.
With the publication of our final Great Risk Transfer report, we will be focusing on these specific recommendations over the coming months, seeking to engage with influential stakeholders such as Ministers, parliamentarians, regulators, and industry groups to address the challenges highlighted over the course of the campaign.
The genesis of the Great Risk Transfer was a recognition that there may be a pattern of risk transfer from institutions to individuals occurring across a range of settings in financial services. This initial hunch was confirmed by our call for evidence in Spring 2020, which suggested there were areas of real concern.
Now with the publication of our final Great Risk Transfer report, we will be focusing on specific recommendations from the report over the coming months, seeking to engage with influential stakeholders such as Ministers, other parliamentarians, regulators and industry groups to address the very real challenges highlighted over the course of the campaign.
Immediate Past President of the IFoA
This transfer of risk poses important questions about the changing priorities and responsibilities of the institutions that once managed those risks. In financial services, it means greater thought about how to ensure consumers are equipped to make decisions that are in their best interest. In public life, it means taking a close look at the relationship between citizens and the welfare state, and questioning whether the current balance of individual and collective responsibility is right.
Risk transfer also poses profound questions for our profession, as many actuaries support clients and employers in reducing risk exposures, only for consumers to be left exposed.
Our final report
Our final report in the Great Risk Transfer campaign brings together a broad body of evidence to make recommendations to address two key challenges:
- Rebalancing risks – We think there are opportunities to ease the burden for consumers by shifting the prime responsibility for certain risks back towards institutions. The mechanism for achieving this is structural changes to markets, products/services, and the legal/regulatory frameworks that shape them.
- Helping consumers manage financial risk through good decision-making – We believe a key driver for new products and services should be to help consumers with the complex decisions involved in managing financial risks effectively and affordably. This could dramatically improve outcomes for many people, and for society as a whole.
To find out more about how these challenges can be addressed, download the final report of the Great Risk Transfer.
Our interim findings
At the start of 2020 we began collecting evidence from actuaries and interested stakeholders about how the Great Risk Transfer is manifesting in practice, how this is affecting people, and what can be done to help those who may be disadvantaged by the trend.
The interim report sets out what we now understand about the extent of the Great Risk Transfer and its implications for society, informed by the insights we have gathered through our call for evidence.
We see the Great Risk Transfer occurring across four distinct areas:
Through the rest of 2020 we will be working with experts in these areas to look in more detail at the regulatory and public policy recommendations that could help protect people against some of the more negative impacts of these risk transfers.
“The IFoA is calling for a public conversation about which risks are worth taking and who should stand behind those risks. Over recent decades, institutions and governments have sought to de-risk in order to manage uncertainty. In trying to reduce or eliminate risk, they have often transferred it to their customers or citizens, who are less well equipped to manage it, often without understanding their needs or preferences.
Many individuals will have been affected by the transfer of risk in more than one area of their lives. The evidence suggests that only a minority will be truly equipped to deal with the aggregate impact of these risks, and make the most of the flexibility and choice they are offered by taking them on.
Responses to the call for evidence have helped us look beyond actuarial practice areas to examples in other areas of society where this trend is taking place. These have helped to expand our understanding about the root causes and societal implications of risk transfer, and will inform our recommendations for a meaningful change in UK government policy.”
Immediate Past President of the IFoA
Our next steps
In this report, the IFoA has made a number of recommendations to government, regulators, and the financial services industry to address some of the negative impacts of the Great Risk Transfer. We will:
- Plan further engagement with stakeholders, and further work with IFoA members, to inform and promote action on solutions to address the issues we have highlighted in this and our interim report. In June 2021, we ran two roundtable discussions in conjunction with think tank Demos:
- Accept that we, and the actuarial profession we represent, have a role to play ourselves in tackling these issues
- Work to improve our members’ understanding of how consumers experience financial risks, products, services, and communications as an essential component of actuaries’ professional skillset.
By taking these steps we believe we can have a positive impact in addressing the challenges of the Great Risk Transfer.
If you would like to talk to us about working to address these issues and our recommendations, please contact email@example.com .
At our launch event in January attendees heard from the Australian researcher Myra Hamilton, whose work engages with the Great Risk Transfer, not only from a financial services point of view but more broadly in terms of changes to our politics and society over recent decades.
Case study - Risk Individualisation in UK Life Insurance - by Arjen van der Heide
Dr Arjen van der Heide’s research explores how risk has been individualised in the UK life insurance industry over recent decades.
More about Policy and Public Affairs
The IFoA is a leading voice for the actuarial profession in the field of policy development and thought leadership.
Find out more about our work.
Filter or search events
Over recent months there has been a sharp rise in M&A activity involving British businesses, with interest from overseas, domestic buyers and Private Equity investors.
Frank Redington is recognised as one of the most influential actuaries of all time. In this talk, Craig will review some of Redington's most important ideas. He will identify the consistent actuarial principles that form a common thread across the contributions Redington made to a broad range of actuarial fields, and will highlight the ongoing relevance of Redington's thinking to 21st century actuarial practice.
The IFoA Mental Health working party look back over their week of blogs and podcasts considering all aspects of the relationship between mental health and life insurance. The expert panel spans adviser, underwriter and actuarial experience and they explore triggers for purchasing insurance relating to mental health, the various routes to insurance and how these may be more suited to different people depending on their conditions and preferences, the products and processes involved in purchasing these as well as what claims and support are available to policyholders and how to access them.
Part of the 'Finance in the Public Interest 2022' webinar series. If it was ever okay to consider your business in isolation from its surroundings, today it most definitely is not. Thinking about business within its surrounding system is now a necessity. The question we seek to discuss is: How should we prescribe the boundaries in which we consider problems to enable us to create better products and more resilient companies and systems?
What will happen to DC pension savers who see life annuities as poor VFM but still want an income for life? Pooled annuity funds could offer them a decent lifetime income while reducing significantly the complex choices and risk inherent in income drawdown. They could be the next generation of CDC pension schemes, slotting into the existing DC framework as a post-retirement option.
Investment risk-sharing is a fundamental part of whole-life collective defined contribution (CDC) pension schemes, such as the Royal Mail CDC. But how does investment risk-sharing benefit members? And does it favour some groups of members over others?