Behavioural Aspects of Institutional Investment Decision-Making

Investigating institutional investors' decision-making

The IFoA’s Actuarial Research Centre (ARC) awarded a grant in 2017 to support a significant behavioural finance research programme, specifically focusing on decision-making by institutional investors. The selected research team was comprised of researchers from City, University of London, Ipsos, Leeds University Business School, University of East London and Reverence Limited. The team itself included Professor Peter Ayton, Dr Iain Clacher, Dr Volker Thoma, Colin Strong and David Calfo, who brought expertise from a range of disciplines.

Project summary

The aim of this research project was to explore the decision-making of institutional investors, in particular insurers and pension schemes, and the biases that may affect their investment decisions. These included, but were not limited to, emotional, psychological and political biases. The project explored what "rational" or “optimal” behaviour could be expected from an institution in certain economic scenarios, based on its investment objectives and underlying values. It then explored whether there was solid evidence that behavioural factors, such as human psychology, company culture, corporate politics and conflicts of interest caused them to deviate from optimal behaviour. The research provided a number of practical conclusions that can be used by actuaries working in investment and related areas.

Project highlights

ARC Webinar Series 2021 – Understanding biases in trustee decision making

21 January 2021

Professor Peter Ayton, Professor Iain Clacher, Colin Strong and Dr Leonardo Weiss-Cohen presented their research findings in the first of the ARC Webinar Series 2021. Drawing on experimental and qualitative research techniques, along with a literature review of existing psychology and behavioural economics, the research team concluded that trustees were not immune from decision-making biases and proposed ways in which these could be reduced.

The presentation was followed by a panel discussion and Q&A.   A recording of the webinar is available on YouTube and has been posted on the online learning webpages.

Final Report

21 January 2021

The Final Report, entitled Pension Trustee Decision Making, was launched at the ARC Behavioural Finance Webinar on 21 January 2021. The report investigated potential biases that could arise in group decision making and offered a number of recommendations for enhancing decision making by trustees. In its Foreword, the Behavioural Finance Steering Group highlighted the report’s relevance for anyone who is involved in group decision making, acts as an advisor or makes decisions on behalf of others.

The research findings were discussed by Professor Peter Ayton in an article in The Actuary. Split decisions: Pension trustees and decision-making looked at group thinking and decision heuristics and presented the case for improving the collective efficacy of trustee boards.

Media coverage

  • Professional Pensions published an article on 21 January on the Report entitled ‘IFoA makes recommendations for improving pension trustee judgement and decision making’.
  • Pension Age covered the report in its article ‘IFoA outlines trustee decision making best practice amid evidence of decision biases’.
  • The findings were also the subject of a Burges Salmon blog post in Lexology. 

Project background

To date, a substantial volume of work has been undertaken in the field of behavioural finance to explore the psychological factors affecting investment decisions made by individuals.  In contrast, “behavioural” factors (such as politics or human psychology) affecting decisions and actions made by institutional investors, such as insurers or pension schemes, are less understood.  This could be significant for actuaries working in the areas of investment advice, asset-liability matching, liability-driven investments and investment risk management within institutional investors, such as insurance companies and defined benefit pension schemes. A significant number of actuaries work today as advisors to institutional investors’ key decision-making bodies.  Typical roles could include:

  • Investment advisors to occupational pension schemes
  • Professionals setting the investment strategy for assets of insurance companies
  • Investment strategists for assets backing long-term life insurance liabilities, such as with-profit or annuity funds

Investment objectives and asset allocation decisions for the types of organisations mentioned above would typically be expected to be driven by the long term relationship between the value of assets and the actuarial or accounting value of liabilities. In setting a long term investment strategy, investment actuaries are often required to form judgements and make assumptions (explicit or implicit) based on commonly accepted economic theories.  This usually relies on the expectation of rational behaviour, in line with stated public objectives of these organisations and efficient market hypothesis in various forms.

The objective of this research was to test whether the actual decisions made by organisations, as groups of individuals, are influenced by a wider set of factors, such as emotions, human psychology, company culture, corporate politics and conflicts of interest.  This could provide a better tool kit for actuaries and other professionals in managing risks and making financial projections for these organisations.

Research outputs

  • Behavioral Biases in Pension Fund Trustees’ Decision Making  was published in the Review of Behavioral Finance in June 2019. This set out the landscape in which pension fund trustees operate and make their decisions. The paper reviewed the literature of behavioural finance research applicable to similar situations to identify avenues of further exploration. Preprint
  • Extraneous menu-effects influence financial decisions made by pension trustees  was published in Economic Letters in Feb 2020. The research team tested 252 pension scheme trustees for the influence of extraneous manipulations to the menu of options on investment decisions. They found that trustees were influenced by changes to the menu item mix, context and layout. The paper concluded that care should be taken when preparing information presented to trustees, in order to reduce biases that can be detrimental to pension outcomes. Preprint
  • Pension scheme trustees as surrogate decision makers  was published by Finance Research Letters in April 2021. This found that when setting targets for pension replacement income, trustees project their own preferences instead of reflecting member preferences. Preprint
  • Professional investors make better mutual fund selections  research report found that pension professionals tend to choose the cheapest mutual fund, regardless of past performance.
  • The final report on Pension Trustee Decision Making provided a summary of the research with a number of practical recommendations for actuarial investment practitioners.

IFoA events

  • NED event: Behavioural Finance and Boards, 18 June 2019. A recording from this event is available here. 
  • ARC Webinar Series 2018: Behavioural Aspects of Institutional Investment Decision-Making, 4 October 2018. Professor Peter Ayton (City, University of London) and co-researcher Dr Iain Clacher (University of Leeds) explore some of the early developments in this research programme. A recording of the webinar is available on YouTube and is also posted on the IFoA's online learning webpages.

Presentations

 

Contact Details

If you want more information about our research programmes please contact the IFoA Actuarial Research Centre:

arc@actuaries.org.uk

Filter or search events

Start date
E.g., 28/06/2022
End date
E.g., 28/06/2022

Events calendar

  • Spaces available

    There is a lack of publicly available information covering the practices insurers employ to manage their exposure to reinsurance recapture risk. A working party was set-up to shed light on the different approaches insurers use to mitigate this complicated to manage risk. This report is intended to form part of a publicly available information repository that market practitioners can refer to and reflect on as best practice evolves and develops.

  • Spaces available

    The Actuaries’ Carbon Collaboration (ACC) is a group of actuaries and other professionals working towards a coherent understanding of the issues around greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by considering them in an actuarial context.

    Emissions into and absorption from the atmosphere can be modelled in the same way that we model variable cash flows, including the impacts of uncertain quantities and timing. The ACC’s work investigates both the insights that this analogy provides and its limitations.

  • Spaces available

    This talk presents the work of the Data and Modelling workstream of the IFoA Mental Health Working Party. We explore data and modelling considerations in the risk assessment and underwriting of mental health conditions. We will also consider how newer risk factors and improved data availability might open up opportunities for additional underwriting and product designs.

  • Pensions Dashboards

    12 July 2022

    Spaces available

    As the industry prepares for Pensions Dashboards, we have lined up a specialist panel who is at the heart of the ongoing work in this area. Hear the latest developments, future proposals and have the opportunity to put forward your questions to our speakers.

  • Spaces available

    Artificial Intelligence is heralded as a game-changer to the ways industries use data, with the insurance industry especially looking to embrace these new technologies. This brings many questions – not least around data privacy, ethics, potential biases and so on – with regulators increasingly interested in developments.

    Moreover, whilst the stunning progress of specific technologies such as Watson and Alphazero made headlines some years ago, current commercial applications of AI remain far from mature.

  • Spaces available

    This webinar will cover:

    • Some background on the risks of misselling in an ESG context, including the DWS case

    • Achieving positive impact is a strong antidote to the risks of greenwashing or ESG misselling, however this risks having a tension with fiduciary responsibilities

    • This tension can be resolved with a concept called Universal Ownership

    • Under Universal ownership, investors have an appetite to make a loss in order to achieve positive impact, and yet still have no compromise on their fiduciary responsibilities

  • Spaces available

    This session will focus on the transformation roadmap of the healthcare sector in KSA and the role of actuarial capabilities in enhancing its evolution to the desired end stage as per the objectives of the Vision 2030. The discussion will focus how the system has evolved so far and shed light on  the expected future changes. Through examining  the transformation, we will highlight how the sector is and can use actuarial  expertise to not only assist with this transformation but also use basic actuarial principles to identify the key risks and their respective mitigation strategies.

  • Spaces available

    The purpose of this research paper is to explore enterprise risk management lessons which can be learnt from the Covid-19 pandemic in preparation for potential future pandemics as well as other “gray rhino” or “black swan” events. This paper is not intended to be an all-encompassing solution to the issues presented by Covid-19; rather, the content has been provided to help drive discussions regarding how risk management processes may need to evolve in line with the dynamic nature of the underlying risks that they sometimes need to capture.

  • Spaces available

    The IFoA's Infrastructure Working Party, led by Chris Lewin, will present its new introductory guide to infrastructure investment, which will be published on the IFoA web-site prior to the webinar.   Those readers whose institutions have already taken the plunge into infrastructure will know that it is a highly complex and diverse field of activity.   This guide does not explore all the matters which investors take into account, but it does discuss many of the more important points, including the risks and past returns, benchmarking, and ESG and SDG considerations.    Attendees will be invi

  • Spaces available

    Health contributes to happiness at the personal, family, community and societal level.  Health, importantly underpins all our economic security. This talk will explore the drivers of our health, the measurement of health and the steps we can take to improve health – most of which lie outside the NHS.