The IFoA together with Independent Age have produced a joint report, Will the Cap Fit? What the government should consider before introducing a cap on social care costs, assessing changes to social care funding policy and the potential implications of those changes. The report aims to encourage Government to develop a social care system that is sustainable in the long term as soon as possible as the current system is in crisis and is likely to worsen in the face of an ageing population.
What you will get from the report
- An understanding of why the current social care system is unsustainable and in crisis
- An assessment of various proposed levels for a cap on care costs and the impact those levels will have on cumulative care costs
- Policy recommendations for Government
A carefully designed care cap could provide a means of social insurance, which previously has not existed, in order for families to plan for later life with certainty. Our report assesses the amount individuals would have to contribute towards their own care based on:
- A £35,000 cap, based on the Dilnot Report
- A £72,000 cap, contained in the Care Act
- Our proposed all – inclusive £100,000 cap
These scenarios are applied to a range of typical pensioner households, varied by gender, age, region, and level of assets and income on starting to pay for care. This allows us to demonstrate the impacts and likelihood of individuals benefitting from a cap or means-test based on their specific circumstances.
We recommend implementing an all-inclusive cap of £100,000. This would cover all cumulative care costs, unlike the caps proposed in the Dilnot Report or in the Care Act. This would provide individuals, who have the means to pay for their own care, clarity on their likely future care costs, with them having to pay for the first £100,000 and costs beyond this met by the state. This would reduce complexity and make the balance between individual and State provision easier to understand.
Key findings include:
- An ‘all-inclusive cap’ set at £100,000 protects those who live longer than average in residential care and truly caps the full range of care costs for those with high care needs.
- Unless the cap is all-inclusive, taking into account accommodation and daily living costs, individuals will pay more than £150,000 by the time they have been in care for six years and £300,000 by the time they have been in care for ten years.
- The £100,000 all-inclusive cap reduces variation in total care costs between regions in England. Under the £72,000 cap, care costs can vary by over £130,000 by year 6 between the North East, where the costs are lowest, and South East, where the costs are highest. The £100,000 all-inclusive cap reduces this variation to just £2,000.
- Only the £35,000 cap, proposed by the Dilnot Report, and the all-inclusive £100,000 cap will provide protection to those who live longer than expected in residential care.
For further information on any of our public affairs or policy work please contact us on:
Filter or search events
The purpose of this research paper is to explore enterprise risk management lessons which can be learnt from the Covid-19 pandemic in preparation for potential future pandemics as well as other “gray rhino” or “black swan” events. This paper is not intended to be an all-encompassing solution to the issues presented by Covid-19; rather, the content has been provided to help drive discussions regarding how risk management processes may need to evolve in line with the dynamic nature of the underlying risks that they sometimes need to capture.
This webinar will discuss good exam technique, including various approaches candidates can take in managing their time completing their exams in the online format.
This session is for new candidates and existing candidates where we will be discussing the practical steps you need to take leading up your exam and on the day. We will be discussing how to testing the online exam platform, downloading and uploading your paper and key information from the Exam Handbook.
The exam webinar is for candidates, new to IFoA exams and returning candidates, sitting in the September 2022 exam session.
The role of Non-Executive Directors has become increasingly challenging and critical over the past few years.
Big picture thinking, Governance knowledge, Independent mindset, Ambassador potential and Energy and commitment: these are the essential skills sought in a successful NED, according to the Chartered Governance Institute (UK & Ireland).
In parallel, Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) criteria are increasingly key and used by investors to measure the sustainability and ethical impact of investing in an organisation.
This webinar will cover:
• Some background on the risks of misselling in an ESG context, including the DWS case
• Achieving positive impact is a strong antidote to the risks of greenwashing or ESG misselling, however this risks having a tension with fiduciary responsibilities
• This tension can be resolved with a concept called Universal Ownership
• Under Universal ownership, investors have an appetite to make a loss in order to achieve positive impact, and yet still have no compromise on their fiduciary responsibilities
In the UK, the idea of collective defined contribution (CDC) pension schemes is gaining more attention with the launch of the Royal Mail CDC scheme, the first of its kind in the UK. Our recent research on CDC plans investigates the sources of the putative benefits of CDC schemes: the smoothing of pensions for members. Using an attribution analysis to burrow into the scheme design, the reason for the smoothing of members' pensions is explained and understood.
The IFoA's Infrastructure Working Party, led by Chris Lewin, will present its new introductory guide to infrastructure investment, which will be published on the IFoA web-site prior to the webinar. Those readers whose institutions have already taken the plunge into infrastructure will know that it is a highly complex and diverse field of activity. This guide does not explore all the matters which investors take into account, but it does discuss many of the more important points, including the risks and past returns, benchmarking, and ESG and SDG considerations. Attendees will be invi
Social care reform has long been on the to-do list for successive governments over the last two decades. In February, the government’s proposed reforms to adult social care [including cap on care costs] was published. Against this backdrop of funding promise and rising National Insurance taxation, in this session we will debate the resilience of these new proposals, the impact of future demand for care services and what role for the insurance industry and the important role it has played in long-term care funding in other countries where public-private partnership works.
Health contributes to happiness at the personal, family, community and societal level. Health, importantly underpins all our economic security. This talk will explore the drivers of our health, the measurement of health and the steps we can take to improve health – most of which lie outside the NHS.
We are delighted to announce the return of GIRO as an in-person conference, giving you an opportunity to connect with actuaries in your practice area. Join leading experts to discuss key issues, emerging ideas, and new research across the General Insurance sector.
Life Conference returns as an in-person conference in 2022, giving you an opportunity to connect with your peers and fellow actuaries in your sector, in person. You will also hear leading experts discuss key issues, emerging ideas, and new research across the Life insurance sector.
Mortality and morbidity risk varies by variables such as age, sex and smoking. In traditional actuarial experience analysis, these variables, and certain combinations thereof can be explored. However, with the wealth of data now available it is becoming increasingly challenging to identify the key drivers of experience and account for the interaction between different variables. A univariate approach often compares apples and pears, for example males are more likely to smoke and have larger policies than females. Likewise, variable interactions are missed unless specifically included.