As part of the preparation for the GI TORP Working Party presentation to the 2017 GIRO conference in October, the working party carried out a survey covering the level of automation used in general insurance reserving processes. This survey focused on the timescales and pressures of the reserving cycle and the current state of play relating to the prevalence of manual processes and the penetration of proprietary software. It looked at automation techniques as a mechanism for relieving the pressures on the reserving process resulting from solvency 2, the reserving cycle, IFRS and the pressure for faster close processes.

Download the results of the survey

Summary of Results

  • The total number of survey participants was 39, among which:
    • 50% are personal lines insurers
    • 40% are Lloyd’s/London Market insurers
    • 10% are reinsurers or health insurers
       
  • About 2/3 of the participants are doing business mainly in the UK (some of which also in other European countries), and about 1/4 have US operations
     
  • There was a good balance of small, medium and large firms in terms of Gross SII TP volumes
    • 25% less than £100m
    • 20% between £100m and £500m
    • 20% between £500m and £1bn
    • 35% more than £1bn
       
  • Regarding their reserving process, the participants currently use:
    • An-off-the-shelf product from a software supplier -> about 50%
    • Excel spreadsheets (exclusively) -> about 25%
    • An internally-built/coded platform (potentially combined with spreadsheets and other software) -> about 25%

It is worth noting that, within the group of firms that only use Excel spreadsheets for their reserving, half of them are actually very large firms from a gross solvency 2 technical provision perspective (SII TPs > £1bn) while the others are composed of small and medium firms.

  • Automation: Regarding the level of automation of their current reserving process, the responses have been:
    • 50% as being '50 manual and 50% automated'
    • 30% as being mostly manual or not automated at all
    • 20% as being mostly automated with little manual work needed

It is worth noting that approximately 1/3 of the participants using an off-the-shelf reserving platform have described their process as being 'mostly manual' while the remaining 2/3 have responded '50% manual and 50% automated.' However, within those exclusively using spreadsheets, only 1/4 have considered their process to be 'mostly manual', which might show that using a dedicated software package doesn't seem to solve most of the challenges related to automation even compared to spreadsheets. This appears to be consistent with the point that 90% of all the participants have responded 'Yes' or 'Maybe' to the question, ' Given time, would you like to invest in further automation of your reserving process?', disregarding what tools or platforms they are using.

  • Based on the other results (incl. open-ended responses) also received, the main outcomes to highlight relate to the following items:
     
    • Data Quality – This appears to be the main issue for most participants. Data quality is often not very good, it often needs to be processed at a significant level (for 3/4 of the participants) when coming from Management Information/Information Technology or from other teams, and it is not always consistent between quarters (e.g. quarter on quarter data formatting changes are common place). Data Quality arguably represents the main area of improvement as evidenced by the responses, with  of the participants considering 'data processing as an essential area of improvement regarding automation'
       
    • Level of Automation – There remains a significant volume of manual work needed by reserving actuaries (e.g. regarding data processing, ultimate claims selections, model blending, movement analyses from a quarter to another). Most participants would like to see an increased level of automation to allow for more time to do analyses and in-depth reserve review (but also reduce manual mistakes due to “tedious” tasks that must be achieved). Nevertheless, a few participants have said that there shouldn’t be too much automation – some is needed to provide first cuts/validation, but it always will be overlaid by manual adjustments and elements of expert judgement
       
    • Reporting – Reporting processes are mostly manual at the moment for almost 50% of the participants.  This seems to be the other major challenge regarding automation alongside data quality. In particular: QRTs, translation from GAAP/IFRS reserves to SII TPs and PowerPoint presentations (to various committees) are the most manual tasks to do for reserving actuaries in terms of reporting. One of the participants mentioned the potential of data visualisation software like Tableau for reporting purposes.
       
    • IFRS 17 – This will be a major event which will increase the impetus for more automation within reserving processes for 75% of the participants. In particular, participants appear to want to try to use as much work as possible from SII for upcoming IFRS 17 implementation, and have a consistency between SII and IFRS 17 (e.g. regarding cash-flows)
       
    • Machine Learning – About 50% of the participants have responded 'Yes' or 'Maybe' when asked if they had already given any considerations to machine learning techniques applied to reserving (that includes both personal lines and Lloyd's/London Market insurers). It is seen as a great opportunity for them. However, a large majority have said that they are still in the very early/conceptual stages onl, and that they they are still a bit scpetical about it. This is mainly because f the level of complexity involved and the the technical skills that would be required to implement and maintain such models
       
    • Consequences of Automation – Most participants have said that automation would help do the 'tedious' work faster, reduce time/manual mistakes and allow for more time for deep analyses. A few of them, however, mentioned that currently most of the work performed by reserving actuaries actually relates to data/processing/manual tasks within their organisation, and on that perspective, automation could potentially reduce the need for reserving actuaries in the long term (hence the question of a possible reduction of Reserving sizes over time

Related documents

Contact Details

If you want more information about this research working party please contact the Communities Team.

professional.communities@actuaries.org.uk

Filter or search events

Start date
E.g., 29/06/2022
End date
E.g., 29/06/2022

Events calendar

  • Spaces available

    There is a lack of publicly available information covering the practices insurers employ to manage their exposure to reinsurance recapture risk. A working party was set-up to shed light on the different approaches insurers use to mitigate this complicated to manage risk. This report is intended to form part of a publicly available information repository that market practitioners can refer to and reflect on as best practice evolves and develops.

  • Spaces available

    The Actuaries’ Carbon Collaboration (ACC) is a group of actuaries and other professionals working towards a coherent understanding of the issues around greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by considering them in an actuarial context.

    Emissions into and absorption from the atmosphere can be modelled in the same way that we model variable cash flows, including the impacts of uncertain quantities and timing. The ACC’s work investigates both the insights that this analogy provides and its limitations.

  • Spaces available

    This talk presents the work of the Data and Modelling workstream of the IFoA Mental Health Working Party. We explore data and modelling considerations in the risk assessment and underwriting of mental health conditions. We will also consider how newer risk factors and improved data availability might open up opportunities for additional underwriting and product designs.

  • Pensions Dashboards

    12 July 2022

    Spaces available

    As the industry prepares for Pensions Dashboards, we have lined up a specialist panel who is at the heart of the ongoing work in this area. Hear the latest developments, future proposals and have the opportunity to put forward your questions to our speakers.

  • Spaces available

    Artificial Intelligence is heralded as a game-changer to the ways industries use data, with the insurance industry especially looking to embrace these new technologies. This brings many questions – not least around data privacy, ethics, potential biases and so on – with regulators increasingly interested in developments.

    Moreover, whilst the stunning progress of specific technologies such as Watson and Alphazero made headlines some years ago, current commercial applications of AI remain far from mature.

  • Spaces available

    This webinar will cover:

    • Some background on the risks of misselling in an ESG context, including the DWS case

    • Achieving positive impact is a strong antidote to the risks of greenwashing or ESG misselling, however this risks having a tension with fiduciary responsibilities

    • This tension can be resolved with a concept called Universal Ownership

    • Under Universal ownership, investors have an appetite to make a loss in order to achieve positive impact, and yet still have no compromise on their fiduciary responsibilities

  • Spaces available

    This session will focus on the transformation roadmap of the healthcare sector in KSA and the role of actuarial capabilities in enhancing its evolution to the desired end stage as per the objectives of the Vision 2030. The discussion will focus how the system has evolved so far and shed light on  the expected future changes. Through examining  the transformation, we will highlight how the sector is and can use actuarial  expertise to not only assist with this transformation but also use basic actuarial principles to identify the key risks and their respective mitigation strategies.

  • Spaces available

    The purpose of this research paper is to explore enterprise risk management lessons which can be learnt from the Covid-19 pandemic in preparation for potential future pandemics as well as other “gray rhino” or “black swan” events. This paper is not intended to be an all-encompassing solution to the issues presented by Covid-19; rather, the content has been provided to help drive discussions regarding how risk management processes may need to evolve in line with the dynamic nature of the underlying risks that they sometimes need to capture.

  • Spaces available

    The IFoA's Infrastructure Working Party, led by Chris Lewin, will present its new introductory guide to infrastructure investment, which will be published on the IFoA web-site prior to the webinar.   Those readers whose institutions have already taken the plunge into infrastructure will know that it is a highly complex and diverse field of activity.   This guide does not explore all the matters which investors take into account, but it does discuss many of the more important points, including the risks and past returns, benchmarking, and ESG and SDG considerations.    Attendees will be invi

  • Spaces available

    Health contributes to happiness at the personal, family, community and societal level.  Health, importantly underpins all our economic security. This talk will explore the drivers of our health, the measurement of health and the steps we can take to improve health – most of which lie outside the NHS.