You are here

Mortality improvements and CMI_2020: frequently asked questions (FAQs)

The Continuous Mortality Investigation (CMI)1 provides authoritative and independent mortality and sickness rate tables for actuaries advising UK life insurers and pension funds. It operates as a not-for-profit private company that is wholly owned by the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA). The CMI Mortality Projections Model (the “CMI Model”) is widely used by actuaries in the financial management of UK pension schemes and life insurance companies.

This note accompanies the release of the latest version of the CMI Mortality Projections Model, CMI_2020. It describes the CMI Model and contains background information on recent mortality experience 2.

Key findings

Standardised mortality rates in England & Wales were on average 12% higher in 2020 than in 2019 as a consequence of the coronavirus pandemic. This is the largest one-year increase in mortality rates since 1929, and mortality in 2020 was higher than we have seen in England & Wales since 2008. The CMI provided regular updates on mortality and excess deaths in 2020 through its regular mortality monitor.

While 2020 mortality experience will affect actuarial calculations, it is likely to be an outlier and not indicative of the future path that mortality rates will follow. For this reason, the standard version of CMI_2020 will place no weight on the data for 2020 when projecting mortality rates. However, users can modify the Model to take account of data for 2020, fully or partially, if they choose.

The CMI consulted with users of the Model on these changes in September. Respondents across the pensions and insurance industries acknowledged that there was no perfect way to address the impact of the pandemic on the Model but were strongly supportive of the decision to place no weight on the 2020 data.

The standard version of CMI_2020 produces cohort life expectancies at age 65 that are about four weeks lower for males, and one week lower for females than in the previous version of the CMI Model, CMI_2019.

Mortality improvements are not the same for everyone. Over the period 2001-2019, people aged between 65 and 89 living in less-deprived areas of England & Wales have experienced mortality improvements about 1% a year higher than those in more-deprived areas.

FAQ sections

  1. The latest version of the CMI Model, CMI_2020
  2. Historical mortality in England & Wales
  3. How the CMI Model works
  4. Mortality terminology

1. The latest version of the CMI Model, CMI_2020

What happened to mortality in 2020?

Standardised mortality rates in England & Wales were on average 12% higher in 2020 than in 2019, as a consequence of the coronavirus pandemic. This is the largest one-year increase in mortality rates since 1929, and mortality in 2020 was higher than we have seen in England & Wales since 2008.

How has the CMI Model changed compared to CMI_2019?

In normal circumstances, we update the CMI Model each year to use more recent mortality data. However, the impact of the coronavirus pandemic means that mortality in 2020 is unlikely to provide a good guide to future mortality. Because of this, although we have updated the dataset for CMI_2020 to use data for calendar years 1980-2020, rather than 1979-2019 for CMI_2019, we put no weight on the data for 2020.

What does CMI_2020 mean for cohort life expectancy?

CMI_2020 has slightly lower expected mortality improvements in the short to medium term than in CMI_2019.

Chart A illustrates the progression of cohort life expectancy for members of defined benefit pension schemes since the first version of the CMI Model, CMI_2009. CMI_2020 produces slightly lower cohort life expectancies than CMI_2019. At age 65, cohort life expectancy is around four weeks lower for males and one week lower for females than in CMI_2019.

Cohort life expectancy is a subjective measure that depends on assumed future changes in mortality. Although Chart A shows that cohort life expectancy has typically been falling in recent years, this does not necessarily mean that mortality rates were increasing – instead it typically reflects lower projected rates of future mortality improvement.

Chart A: Cohort life expectancies as at 1 January 2021 at age 65 from CMI_2020 and earlier versions

Chart A: Cohort life expectancies as at 1 January 2021 at age 65 from CMI_2020 and earlier versions

How are these cohort life expectancy figures calculated?

In order to calculate cohort life expectancies, the CMI Model requires its users to make assumptions about current mortality rates and the long-term rate of mortality improvements:

  • We have used an illustrative long-term rate of 1.5% a year, as this is a commonly-used value, but the CMI does not comment on its appropriateness or make a recommendation. 
  • We have used the latest pension scheme mortality tables, S3PMA and S3PFA. These lead to higher life expectancy than mortality tables for the general population.

2. Historical mortality in England & Wales

How has mortality changed in the past?

Chart B shows standardised mortality rates (SMRs) in the general population of England & Wales from 1980 to 2020, corresponding to the data used to calibrate CMI_2020. Standardised mortality rates nearly halved between 1980 and 2019, although the fall in mortality rates was modest between 2011 and 2019.

Chart B: Standardised mortality rates since 1980

Chart B: Standardised mortality rates since 1980

Chart C shows mortality improvements, based on SMRs, for recent five-year periods (e.g. the point for 2020 is the average annual improvement between 2015 and 2020). Mortality improvements for individual years can be very volatile because of short-term effects such as flu and cold winters, as well as the coronavirus pandemic, so we use five-year averages to reduce the impact of these short-term variations and show the trend more clearly. Average mortality improvements were above 2% a year for most of 2000-2011, but fell to around 0.5% a year for periods ending in 2015-2019. The exceptional nature of the coronavirus pandemic led to five-year average improvements being negative for 2015-2020.

Chart C: Standardised mortality improvements since 2000

Chart C: Standardised mortality improvements since 2000

How do mortality improvements vary between different groups of people?

Analysis of data published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) shows that people aged 65-89 living in less-deprived areas of England & Wales:

  • have higher life expectancy than those in more-deprived areas; and
  • between 2001 and 2019 have experienced mortality improvements about 1% a year higher on average (i.e. life expectancy of individuals living in less-deprived areas has been increasing at a higher rate than for people in more-deprived areas).

Pension scheme members and insurance company policyholders tend to be from less deprived areas on average, so may be expected to experience higher mortality improvements than the general population.

Why did mortality improvements fall after 2011?

There has been considerable debate about the reasons for lower mortality improvements between 2011 and 2019. (The rise in mortality in 2020 is exceptional, and is linked to the coronavirus pandemic.)

Most actuaries expected some slowdown in mortality improvements as some of the factors that led to the previous high improvements could not persist. In particular, a large part of the high mortality improvements in the decades before 2011 came from reductions in deaths from circulatory diseases, such as heart attack and stroke. As the proportion of deaths from circulatory diseases fell, subsequent reductions could not contribute as much to overall mortality improvements. A higher proportion of deaths are now caused by cancer and dementia, which have shown lower mortality improvements.

However, the sudden change around 2011 suggests that other factors were involved. For example, economic conditions are likely to have played a part, with GDP falling by over 6% between Q1 2008 and Q1 2009 and subsequently showing lower growth than in previous decades. This has contributed to lower growth in government spending on health and social care than in the preceding period, which may have affected mortality rates.

3. How the CMI Mortality Projections Model works

Why does the CMI produce the CMI Model?

Actuaries need to make assumptions about mortality rates to help manage pension schemes and insurance companies. They typically do this in two stages – first assessing current mortality rates, and then considering how these rates may change over time. The CMI Model relates only to the second stage.

Many UK pension schemes and insurance companies use the CMI Model either to set their assumptions of how mortality rates will change in future or as a “common language” to communicate assumptions that have been set by another method.

How does the CMI Model work?

The CMI Model enables actuaries to project mortality improvements. They can then apply these improvements to any mortality table to get future mortality rates.

The CMI Model makes its projections by blending between short-term and long-term improvements:

  • The short-term improvements are based on historical mortality data. The CMI Model smooths the data, to reduce the effect of short-term volatility, and estimates current mortality improvements by age and gender. The CMI encourages users of the CMI Model to consider adjusting the initial improvements to reflect the portfolio that they are applying it to.
  • The long-term improvements are set by assumption, rather than being based on data. As the CMI does not make an assumption for long-term mortality improvements, users need to make their own assessment of the long term. The CMI Model is therefore a framework for mortality assumptions, rather than giving a single answer, as different users will have different opinions of long-term improvements, and use different methods to form their views.

What mortality data does the CMI Model use?

The CMI Model is based on data for the general population of England & Wales, published by the ONS, but we make a number of estimates and adjustments:

  • We adjust the population size at ages 85 and above, and at younger ages where we consider the implied mortality rates to be implausible.
  • We make our own estimates of the population and the age distribution of deaths for the final year of data, as the official ONS figures are not available when we update the CMI Model.

Why does the CMI Model use ONS data for England & Wales?

We use population data, rather than datasets collected by the CMI, in order to have a large and consistent dataset over a long period of time.

We use data for England & Wales, rather than the UK, because the relevant data becomes available sooner for England & Wales, so we can keep the CMI Model more up-to-date. We regularly look at results using UK data and, to date, have found that they are little different.

Why is the CMI Model updated?

The CMI Model was introduced in 2009 and has been regularly updated since then:

  • We update it annually to take account of mortality data for the most recent calendar year.
  • We make occasional changes to the way the CMI Model works to reflect evolving thinking on the most appropriate methodologies. For example:
    • In CMI_2018 we introduced the initial addition to mortality improvements, to help users to tailor the CMI Model to their portfolios, and reduced the period smoothing parameter.
    • In CMI_2020 we introduced the ability to place little or no weight on mortality data for exceptional years.

4. Mortality terminology

What is a mortality rate?

A mortality rate is the proportion of people that are expected to die in the following year. For example, if 100 of every 1,000 85-year old males die within a year, then the mortality rate for males at age 85 is 10%.

Mortality rates vary by factors including age, gender and socio-economic status; in particular, mortality rates tend to be higher at older ages.

What is a mortality table?

A mortality table is a set of mortality rates for each age, for a particular group of people at a point in time. Mortality tables are usually based on historical data over a number of years, to smooth out short-term volatility. For example, the CMI’s “S3” mortality tables are for pension scheme members in 2009 to 2016.

What is a standardised mortality rate?

Because mortality rates are higher at older ages, changes in the age distribution of a population can lead to apparent changes in average mortality rates, even if mortality rates at each age do not change. A standardised mortality rate (SMR) can be thought of an average mortality rate for a group of lives, assuming that it has a standard age profile. This enables us to make a consistent comparison of mortality rates over time and between groups. We use the age profile of the 2013 European Standard Population for ages 20 to 100.

What is a mortality improvement?

A mortality improvement measures the reduction in mortality rates from one year to the next. Actuaries usually refer to “improvements” rather than “changes” because mortality rates have tended to fall over the long term. A positive improvement represents a fall in mortality rates. A negative improvement represents a rise in mortality rates.

For example, if:

  • Last year, 100 of every 1,000 85-year old males died within a year (a mortality rate of 10%).
  • This year, only 98 of every 1,000 85-year old males die within a year (a mortality rate of 9.8%).

Then this year’s mortality improvement for 85-year old males is +2%, as there are 2% fewer deaths than in the previous year.

What are period and cohort life expectancies?

Life expectancy is a measure of how much longer, on average, a person in a particular group (by age, gender etc) is expected to live. For example, if females aged 65 have a life expectancy of 25 years, then they are expected to live to 90 on average. Individuals within the group could have much shorter or longer lives.

There are two distinct types of life expectancy, which measure different things:

  • Period life expectancy takes no account of future mortality improvements, only historical data. This means that it is an objective measure for comparing mortality between populations and over time, but it isn’t a realistic assessment of how long people may actually live.
  • Cohort life expectancy does take account of expected future changes in mortality. This makes it useful to actuaries who need to make realistic assumptions about what may happen in the future. Consequently, the CMI tends to focus on cohort life expectancy. However because future changes in mortality are unknown, cohort life expectancy is subjective, and different actuaries will have different views of cohort life expectancy.
 

[1] The CMI is funded by subscriptions from commercial users, and most CMI outputs are only available to Subscribers, and to academics and researchers for non-commercial use. This note is publicly available and its use is subject to the Disclaimer and Copyright Notice in the back page.

[2] We strongly encourage actuaries using CMI_2020 to refer to the more detailed results in Working Paper 147 and its associated outputs, which are restricted to authorised users. Details of how to access the CMI’s research can be found on the CMI section of the IFoA’s website.


Disclaimer: The content of this page has been prepared by and/or on behalf of Continuous Mortality Investigation Limited (CMI). The CMI does not accept any responsibility and/or liability whatsoever for the content or its use. Whilst care has been taken during the development of the content, CMI does not (i) warrant its accuracy; or (ii) guarantee any outcome or result from the application of this content or of any of CMI’s work (whether contained in or arising from the application of this content or otherwise). You assume sole responsibility for your use of this content, and for any and all conclusions drawn from its use. CMI hereby excludes all warranties, representations, conditions and all other terms of any kind whatsoever implied by statute or common law in relation to this content, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. If you are in any doubt as to using anything produced by CMI, please seek independent advice.

Copyright:  You may reproduce the contents of this page in any format or medium provided it is:

  1. reproduced accurately and is unaltered;
  2. not used in a misleading context; and
  3. correctly referenced and includes both CMI’s Disclaimer notice set out above and CMI’s copyright notice, as follows:

© Continuous Mortality Investigation Limited.

 

Continuous Mortality Investigation Limited (“CMI”) is registered in England & Wales

Company number: 8373631

Registered Office: 7th floor, Holborn Gate, 326-330 High Holborn, London, WC1V 7PP

Correspondence address: Two London Wall Place, 123 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5AU

Email: info@cmilimited.co.uk

Tel: 020 7776 3820

 

Website: www.cmilimited.co.uk

Continuous Mortality Investigation Limited is wholly owned by the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries.

Filter or search events

Start date
E.g., 27/11/2021
End date
E.g., 27/11/2021

Events calendar

  • The Growth Mindset for Actuaries

    13 October 2021 - 8 December 2021

    Fully booked.

    This practical course is aimed at actuaries at any stage of their career who want to develop their own growth mindset and apply it to their work setting and personal or professional lifelong learning. The content of the course builds on the lecture given by Dr Helen Wright on Growth Mindset as part of the President’s 2021 Lecture series, and will be delivered over a period of 2 months, from mid-October to early December.

  • Spaces available

    The role of actuaries within the health sector varies considerably from one country to another, due to differences in the local evolution of health systems and the funding models for health services. 

  • Spaces available

    This paper outlines key frameworks for reserving validation and techniques employed. Many companies lack an embedded reserve validation framework and validation is viewed as piecemeal and unstructured.  The paper outlines a case study demonstrating how successful machine learning techniques will become and then goes on to discuss implications.  The paper explores common validation approaches and their role in enhancing governance and confidence.

  • Spaces available

    Content will be aimed at all actuaries looking to understand the issues surrounding mental health in insurance and in particular those looking to ensure products and processes widen access for, and are most useful to, those experiencing periods of poor mental health.
     

  • Spaces available

    The IFoA Policy Briefing 'Can we help consumers avoid running out of money in retirement' examined the benefits of blending a lifetime annuity with income drawdown. Panellists, including providers and advisers, will look at the market practicalities of taking the actuarial theory through into the core advice propositions used by IFAs and Fund Managers. They will share a number of practical issues such as investment consequences before and after retirement and the level of annuity that is appropriate and answer questions from the audience.

  • Speech from the Governor of the Bank of England, Andrew Bailey

    Lincoln's Inn The Treasury Office, London WC2A 3TL
    1 December 2021

    The IFoA is pleased to be hosting the Governor of the Bank of England, Andrew Bailey, to deliver a speech on delivering policyholder protection in insurance regulation.

    The speech will be presented to an in-person audience, and simultaneously live-streamed, at 14.00 on Wednesday 1st December.

  • The Many Faces of Bias

    2 December 2021

    Spaces available

    This webinar looks at the many types of biases, both conscious and unconscious and the impacts they can have in the workplace.  Raising our own awareness and understanding of the issues can help us avoid the pitfalls of unconscious bias in particular.  We’ve all heard the phrase ‘office banter’ but are we sure that’s how those on the receiving end perceive it and is it ok to go along with it?

  • Spaces available

    Actuaries need to take action now - but how?  With a focus on climate change, this session will provide informed insight to enable you to improve your knowledge and understanding of the issues involved, demonstrate how it will impact advice to your clients, and highlight prospective opportunities for actuaries within pensions and wider fields.

  • Spaces available

    Pension scams have become more prevalent as a result of the pandemic, and Trustees have increased responsibilities to protect members, which means that actuaries need to be in a position to provide advice in this area. Our specialist panel will include a professional trustee, an IFA and head administrator, two of whom are members of PASA.

  • Spaces available

    The covid-19 pandemic creates a challenge for actuaries analysing experience data that includes mortality shocks.  To address this we present a methodology for modelling portfolio mortality data that offers local flexibility in the time dimension.  The approach permits the identification of seasonal variation, mortality shocks and late-reported deaths.  The methodology also allows actuaries to measure portfolio-specific mortality improvements.  Results are given for a mature annuity portfolio in the UK

  • Spaces available

    In this webinar, the authors of the 2021 Brian Hey prize winning paper present a new deep learning model called the LocalGLMnet. While deep learning models lead to very competitive regression models, often outperforming classical statistical models such as generalized linear models, the disadvantage is that deep learning solutions are difficult to interpret and explain, and variable selection is not easily possible.

  • Spaces available

    The dominant underwriting approach is a mix between rule-based engines and traditional underwriting. Applications are first assessed by automated rule-based engines which typically are capable of processing only simple applications. The remaining applications are reviewed by underwriters or referred to the reinsurers. This research aims to construct predictive machine learning models for complicated applications that cannot be processed by rule-based engines.

  • Spaces available

    With the Pension Schemes Act 2021 requiring a long term strategy from Trustees and sponsors, choosing a pensions endgame strategy has become even more critical. However, it is important that the endgame options available are adequately assessed before choosing one. With an ever-increasing array of creative and innovative options available, this decision may not be straightforward.