CMI Working Paper 25 includes detail on the Lee-Carter methodology and is analogous to CMI Working Paper 20 which addressed similar areas for the P-spline methodology
The paper includes:
- a description of the models and datasets used;
- a guide to using the output from the Lee-Carter modelling software made available by the CMI;
- a discussion of various features of the Lee-Carter model;
- sample annuity values for use in 2004 produced using the Lee-Carter model and data to 2003 which are then compared to annuity values based on the interim cohort projections, plus how the equivalent sample annuity values for use in each year between 1993 and 2004 would have progressed as more data became available over the period;
- results of some initial investigations into the features of the extension by Renshaw and Haberman of the age-period Lee-Carter model to an age-period-cohort model;
- an assessment of the P-Spline, Lee-Carter and the Lee-Carter age-period-cohort models against some high-level objectives desirable of projection models; and
- a summary of the Working Party's views on the three models.
With this paper, the CMI's Mortality Projections Working Party has completed its work on projection methodologies
There remain many areas regarding projection models that are worthy of further investigation and research and the CMI will retain an interest (and may commission further work) in these areas. The development of projection methodologies and publication of projections are of course areas for the wider profession, and not merely the CMI. Given the importance of projections, the actuarial profession may wish to consider how this should be taken on, perhaps by a Research Group or Working Party.
The CMI previously made available the illustrative software it used in its research into mortality projections, but this software has been withdrawn.
Subsequent to the publication of CMI Working Paper 25, the CMI became aware that the dataset for permanent assurances for male lives used included initial exposures but was used as if these were central exposures. As a result, the results published in CMI Working Paper 25 (and CMI Working Papers 20 and 27) that used this dataset were inaccurate. During the re-work the CMI found an error in the projection software in the calculation of deviance residuals used in boot-strapping simulations for the Lee-Carter models which also affects some of the values in CMI Working Paper 25.
To obtain more details on these two issues and their impact, please see the Errata to CMI Working Papers 20, 25 and 27 on Mortality Projections.
CMI Working Paper 25 has been revised to take account of these issues. Please note that this version of CMI Working Paper 25 has NOT been updated for any developments subsequent to its original publication, other than the noted errata. Should you require a copy of the original version, please contact the CMI.
After the original version of this paper was finalised, the CMI became aware of a development by JP Morgan of LifeMetrics which also makes software available illustrating various methodologies and contains a research paper comparing these methodologies. Rather than delay the publication of CMI Working Paper 25, the CMI did not undertaken comparisons between the conclusions of the papers nor of the results of using the different software.
The Exposure note contains an Important update regarding CMI work on mortality projections (Nov 2007).
CMI Working paper 25 (revised). Stochastic projection methodologies: Lee-Carter model features, example results and implications23 November 2007
- 23 November 2007
- 1 November 2007
You might also like
If you have any questions about the CMI please email
Filter or search events
This practical course is aimed at actuaries at any stage of their career who want to develop their own growth mindset and apply it to their work setting and personal or professional lifelong learning. The content of the course builds on the lecture given by Dr Helen Wright on Growth Mindset as part of the President’s 2021 Lecture series, and will be delivered over a period of 2 months, from mid-October to early December.
The role of actuaries within the health sector varies considerably from one country to another, due to differences in the local evolution of health systems and the funding models for health services.
This paper outlines key frameworks for reserving validation and techniques employed. Many companies lack an embedded reserve validation framework and validation is viewed as piecemeal and unstructured. The paper outlines a case study demonstrating how successful machine learning techniques will become and then goes on to discuss implications. The paper explores common validation approaches and their role in enhancing governance and confidence.
Content will be aimed at all actuaries looking to understand the issues surrounding mental health in insurance and in particular those looking to ensure products and processes widen access for, and are most useful to, those experiencing periods of poor mental health.
The IFoA Policy Briefing 'Can we help consumers avoid running out of money in retirement' examined the benefits of blending a lifetime annuity with income drawdown. Panellists, including providers and advisers, will look at the market practicalities of taking the actuarial theory through into the core advice propositions used by IFAs and Fund Managers. They will share a number of practical issues such as investment consequences before and after retirement and the level of annuity that is appropriate and answer questions from the audience.
The IFoA is pleased to be hosting the Governor of the Bank of England, Andrew Bailey, to deliver a speech on delivering policyholder protection in insurance regulation.
The speech will be presented to an in-person audience, and simultaneously live-streamed, at 14.00 on Wednesday 1st December.
This webinar looks at the many types of biases, both conscious and unconscious and the impacts they can have in the workplace. Raising our own awareness and understanding of the issues can help us avoid the pitfalls of unconscious bias in particular. We’ve all heard the phrase ‘office banter’ but are we sure that’s how those on the receiving end perceive it and is it ok to go along with it?
Actuaries need to take action now - but how? With a focus on climate change, this session will provide informed insight to enable you to improve your knowledge and understanding of the issues involved, demonstrate how it will impact advice to your clients, and highlight prospective opportunities for actuaries within pensions and wider fields.
Pension scams have become more prevalent as a result of the pandemic, and Trustees have increased responsibilities to protect members, which means that actuaries need to be in a position to provide advice in this area. Our specialist panel will include a professional trustee, an IFA and head administrator, two of whom are members of PASA.
The covid-19 pandemic creates a challenge for actuaries analysing experience data that includes mortality shocks. To address this we present a methodology for modelling portfolio mortality data that offers local flexibility in the time dimension. The approach permits the identification of seasonal variation, mortality shocks and late-reported deaths. The methodology also allows actuaries to measure portfolio-specific mortality improvements. Results are given for a mature annuity portfolio in the UK
In this webinar, the authors of the 2021 Brian Hey prize winning paper present a new deep learning model called the LocalGLMnet. While deep learning models lead to very competitive regression models, often outperforming classical statistical models such as generalized linear models, the disadvantage is that deep learning solutions are difficult to interpret and explain, and variable selection is not easily possible.
The dominant underwriting approach is a mix between rule-based engines and traditional underwriting. Applications are first assessed by automated rule-based engines which typically are capable of processing only simple applications. The remaining applications are reviewed by underwriters or referred to the reinsurers. This research aims to construct predictive machine learning models for complicated applications that cannot be processed by rule-based engines.
With the Pension Schemes Act 2021 requiring a long term strategy from Trustees and sponsors, choosing a pensions endgame strategy has become even more critical. However, it is important that the endgame options available are adequately assessed before choosing one. With an ever-increasing array of creative and innovative options available, this decision may not be straightforward.