The issue was widely publicised, together with an initial indication of its impact on annuity values. During the re-work the CMI found an error in the projection software in the calculation of deviance residuals used in boot-strapping simulations for the Lee-Carter models which also affects some of the values in CMI Working Paper 25. Registered users of the CMI's illustrative software were also advised of this issue.
This dataset has also been made available to the Profession, together with the illustrative mortality projections software, without specifying what definition had been used for the exposures. As this software fits mu values, users could reasonably expect the dataset to include Central Exposures but it actually contains Initial Exposures. Therefore, the dataset needed to be adjusted before being used with the software. Central Exposures can be estimated for each age and year from the Initial Exposures using the following formulae:
Central Exposure = Initial Exposure - 0.5 x Deaths.
More details on these two issues and corrections to the parts of CMI Working Papers 20, 25 and 27 affected by these issues is contained in the document Errata to CMI Working papers 20, 25 and 27 on mortality projections.
- The versions of CMI Working Papers 20 and 25 on the website have been replaced with revised versions
- Working Paper 27 has not been revised so that the document on which the CMI sought the views of the Profession remains as it was for consultation; although its content is effectively replaced by Working Paper 30 and the User Guide being issued alongside version 1.0 of the library
- A new release of the software is being sent to all registered users to correct the calculation of the deviance residuals.
- 1 November 2007
CMI Working paper 20 (revised). Stochastic projection methodologies - Further progress and P-Spline model features, example results and implications.1 November 2007
CMI Working paper 27. The library of mortality projections and the draft "library" of mortality projections10 July 2007
- 23 November 2007
You might also like
If you have any questions about the CMI please email
Filter or search events
Over recent months there has been a sharp rise in M&A activity involving British businesses, with interest from overseas, domestic buyers and Private Equity investors.
Frank Redington is recognised as one of the most influential actuaries of all time. In this talk, Craig will review some of Redington's most important ideas. He will identify the consistent actuarial principles that form a common thread across the contributions Redington made to a broad range of actuarial fields, and will highlight the ongoing relevance of Redington's thinking to 21st century actuarial practice.
The IFoA Mental Health working party look back over their week of blogs and podcasts considering all aspects of the relationship between mental health and life insurance. The expert panel spans adviser, underwriter and actuarial experience and they explore triggers for purchasing insurance relating to mental health, the various routes to insurance and how these may be more suited to different people depending on their conditions and preferences, the products and processes involved in purchasing these as well as what claims and support are available to policyholders and how to access them.
Part of the 'Finance in the Public Interest 2022' webinar series. If it was ever okay to consider your business in isolation from its surroundings, today it most definitely is not. Thinking about business within its surrounding system is now a necessity. The question we seek to discuss is: How should we prescribe the boundaries in which we consider problems to enable us to create better products and more resilient companies and systems?
What will happen to DC pension savers who see life annuities as poor VFM but still want an income for life? Pooled annuity funds could offer them a decent lifetime income while reducing significantly the complex choices and risk inherent in income drawdown. They could be the next generation of CDC pension schemes, slotting into the existing DC framework as a post-retirement option.
Investment risk-sharing is a fundamental part of whole-life collective defined contribution (CDC) pension schemes, such as the Royal Mail CDC. But how does investment risk-sharing benefit members? And does it favour some groups of members over others?