You are here

Income protection investigation

The CMI investigates the sickness experience of income protection policyholders

Brief history

A sub-committee of the CMI was set up in 1970 to investigate sickness rates under policies providing permanent health insurance, now better known as income protection. The main dataset extends back to 1975 although occupation class is only included from 1991. There are separate pools for individual business (still open) and group business (closed 2006).

Data and methodology

Data is submitted annually by life offices. Records were historically provided for each individual policy at the start and end of the year, and for each claim in payment during the year, but we now seek to capture movements in more detail and are flexible with formatting. See CMI data for more information about data submission.

Initially the investigations used a Manchester Unity approach, but now the experience is analysed in terms of claim inceptions and terminations (by recovery or death). The current methodology is described in CMI Working Paper 59.

Results

Subscribing life offices receive results in respect of the business for which they have submitted data. Aggregate 'All offices' results are also produced. CMI Working Paper 124 presents the most recent published analysis covering the period 2011 to 2016. Note: Data issues were subsequently discovered affecting the 2011-2016 claim inceptions experience. A summary of the impact is included in Working Paper 149.

The actual claim inceptions experience is compared with that expected using the IP06 graduated inception rates from investigation year 2011, and with that expected using the IPM 1991-98 graduations for 2011-2016 and earlier years. The actual claim terminations experience is compared with that expected using the IPM 1991-98 graduations.

An overview of the IPM 1991-98 graduations is presented in CMI Working Paper 48; details of the IP06 inceptions graduations can be found in CMI Working Paper 120

Claim experience tables

“IP11” claim inception and termination rates, based on individual IP experience of males and females, separately by occupation class, in 2007-2016, were finalised in September 2020. Note: Data issues were subsequently discovered affecting the claim inception rates. A spreadsheet of indicative adjustments to the rates is available alongside Working Paper 136.

Analysis of actual experience compared to that expected using the IP11 rates will commence from investigation year 2017.

The CMI has previously published three main sets of graduated rates for individual IP claim inceptions and two for terminations. The “IP06” claim inception rates were based on individual IP experience of males and females, separately by occupation class, in 2003-2010, and were published in March 2019 alongside Working Paper 120. IPM 1991-98, reflects the experience of male lives in CMI occupation class 1 policies for 1991-98, with an overview presented in CMI Working Paper 48.

The CMI Income Protection Rate Table Tool is a spreadsheet-based application, designed to assist practitioners in deriving claim inception and termination rates, as well as other factors required for their in-house profit testing, valuation and experience analysis tools, such as claim annuity values. It is intended to help practitioners make full use of the published graduations and experience. Version 1.2 of the CMI IP Tool incorporates the “IP11” claim inception and termination rates.

Further analysis

The Income Protection Committee is seeking to gather qualitative information on the impact of COVID-19 for Income Protection providers and views on its implications for the future. The results of this exercise are expected to be summarised and shared with CMI Subscribers. The Committee has extended the deadline for responses to the COVID-19 survey by 3 September 2021, accessible to Authorised Users only.

An analysis of individual Income Protection experience, 1991-2009, by cause of sickness is contained in CMI Working Paper 72.  An accompanying spreadsheet containing two databases, covering inceptions and terminations experience, was also made available to enable practitioners to pursue further investigations. An updated version of these databases, covering 1991-2010, was released alongside Working Paper 96 in which some of the previous analyses were updated.

Supplementary analyses to those included in regular ‘all offices’ results were released in Working Paper 102. These consider IP experience in 2003-2010 by benefit amount and policy duration.

Related documents

Contact Details

If you have any questions about the CMI please email

info@cmilimited.co.uk

Filter or search events

Start date
E.g., 15/08/2022
End date
E.g., 15/08/2022

Events calendar

  • Spaces available

    The purpose of this research paper is to explore enterprise risk management lessons which can be learnt from the Covid-19 pandemic in preparation for potential future pandemics as well as other “gray rhino” or “black swan” events. This paper is not intended to be an all-encompassing solution to the issues presented by Covid-19; rather, the content has been provided to help drive discussions regarding how risk management processes may need to evolve in line with the dynamic nature of the underlying risks that they sometimes need to capture.

  • Spaces available

    This session is for new candidates and existing candidates where we will be discussing the practical steps you need to take leading up your exam and on the day. We will be discussing how to testing the online exam platform, downloading and uploading your paper and key information from the Exam Handbook.

    The exam webinar is for candidates, new to IFoA exams and returning candidates, sitting in the September 2022 exam session.

  • Spaces available

    The role of Non-Executive Directors has become increasingly challenging and critical over the past few years.

    Big picture thinking, Governance knowledge, Independent mindset, Ambassador potential and Energy and commitment: these are the essential skills sought in a successful NED, according to the Chartered Governance Institute (UK & Ireland).

    In parallel, Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) criteria are increasingly key and used by investors to measure the sustainability and ethical impact of investing in an organisation.

  • Spaces available

    This webinar will cover:

    • Some background on the risks of misselling in an ESG context, including the DWS case

    • Achieving positive impact is a strong antidote to the risks of greenwashing or ESG misselling, however this risks having a tension with fiduciary responsibilities

    • This tension can be resolved with a concept called Universal Ownership

    • Under Universal ownership, investors have an appetite to make a loss in order to achieve positive impact, and yet still have no compromise on their fiduciary responsibilities

  • How do CDC pension schemes smooth members' pensions?

    Online webinar
    23 September 2022

    Spaces available

    In the UK, the idea of collective defined contribution (CDC) pension schemes is gaining more attention with the launch of the Royal Mail CDC scheme, the first of its kind in the UK. Our recent research on CDC plans investigates the sources of the putative benefits of CDC schemes: the smoothing of pensions for members.  Using an attribution analysis to burrow into the scheme design, the reason for the smoothing of members' pensions is explained and understood.

  • Spaces available

    The IFoA's Infrastructure Working Party, led by Chris Lewin, will present its new introductory guide to infrastructure investment, which will be published on the IFoA web-site prior to the webinar.   Those readers whose institutions have already taken the plunge into infrastructure will know that it is a highly complex and diverse field of activity.   This guide does not explore all the matters which investors take into account, but it does discuss many of the more important points, including the risks and past returns, benchmarking, and ESG and SDG considerations.    Attendees will be invi

  • Social Care Agenda

    Online webinar
    11 October 2022

    Spaces available

    Social care reform has long been on the to-do list for successive governments over the last two decades. In February, the government’s proposed reforms to adult social care [including cap on care costs] was published. Against this backdrop of funding promise and rising National Insurance taxation, in this session we will debate the resilience of these new proposals, the impact of future demand for care services and what role for the insurance industry and the important role it has played in long-term care funding in other countries where public-private partnership works.

  • Health – Our Greatest Asset

    Online webinar
    2 November 2022

    Spaces available

    Health contributes to happiness at the personal, family, community and societal level.  Health, importantly underpins all our economic security. This talk will explore the drivers of our health, the measurement of health and the steps we can take to improve health – most of which lie outside the NHS.

  • GIRO Conference 2022

    ACC Liverpool  
    21 November 2022 - 23 November 2022
    Spaces available

    We are delighted to announce the return of GIRO as an in-person conference, giving you an opportunity to connect with actuaries in your practice area. Join leading experts to discuss key issues, emerging ideas, and new research across the General Insurance sector.

  • Life Conference 2022

    ACC Liverpool Kings Dock Liverpool Waterfront Liverpool Merseyside L3 4FP
    23 November 2022 - 25 November 2022
    Spaces available

    Life Conference returns as an in-person conference in 2022, giving you an opportunity to connect with your peers and fellow actuaries in your sector, in person. You will also hear leading experts discuss key issues, emerging ideas, and new research across the Life insurance sector.

  • Spaces available

    Mortality and morbidity risk varies by variables such as age, sex and smoking. In traditional actuarial experience analysis, these variables, and certain combinations thereof can be explored. However, with the wealth of data now available it is becoming increasingly challenging to identify the key drivers of experience and account for the interaction between different variables. A univariate approach often compares apples and pears, for example males are more likely to smoke and have larger policies than females. Likewise, variable interactions are missed unless specifically included.