You are here

Superseded investigations

In 2013, the CMI changed the structure of its investigations into the mortality experience of policyholders with assurances and annuitants of life offices, and the morbidity experience of critical illness policyholders

Life office mortality investigations - brief history

The life office mortality investigation is the longest running investigation of the CMI. The full history of the investigation is detailed in CMI Report 1. In November 2013 the CMI changed the structure of the life office mortality and critical illness investigations into annuitant mortality and assurances investigations: the latter focuses on both mortality and critical illness.

For information on the CMI's more recent work on life office mortality, please see the Annuities investigation and/or the Assurance investigation.

Data and methodology

The CMI’s life office mortality investigation collected what is termed “scheduled" data. That is, the data provided by contributing offices was in a census format containing the total numbers of policies (in force and deaths) split by age and duration. No policy specific details were requested from contributors. The analysis methodology is summarised in section 2 of CMI Working Paper 45.

Results

Contributing offices received results in respect of the business for which they have submitted data. Aggregate ‘All Office’ results are also produced.

Mortality tables

The '00' series base mortality tables were published in CMI Working Paper 21, CMI Working Paper 22 and CMI Report 23.

The '92' series base mortality tables and projections were published in CMI Report 17. An interim basis for adjusting the 92 series mortality projections was published in CMI Working Paper 1.

The '80' series base mortality tables and projections were published in CMI Report 10.

Earlier mortality tables were published in various printed volumes which are not available electronically.

Download all published CMI base mortality tables in Excel format.

Impaired assured lives investigation

Between the years 1982 and 2006, the CMI ran an investigation into the mortality of impaired assured lives. A report on the latest data and results, covering the years 1995 to 2006, is contained within CMI Working Paper 36.

Critical illness investigation - brief history

The CMI critical illness investigation started in 1999 with the first data collected in 2000. The first data collected pertained to claims settled during 1998 and 1999. The 1998 data was significantly lower in volume than subsequent years, so has not been analysed further.

In November 2013, the CMI changed the structure of the life office mortality and critical illness investigations into annuitant mortality and assurances investigations: the latter focuses on both mortality and critical illness.

For information on the CMI's more recent work on critical illness, please see the Assurances investigation.

Data, methodology and results

Data are collected for both ‘stand alone’ and ‘full accelerated’ (where the cover includes death as well as critical illness) business. 

In the early years of the investigation, critical illness data was collected annually from insurance companies on both policies in force and claims settled during an investigation year. The original analysis methodology is described in detail in CMI Working Paper 14. The results compared actual settled claims against expected diagnosed claims, calculated using CIBT93 (a population-based table which was originally contained in A Critical Review, presented to SIAS in 2000). These results have subsequently been referred to as ‘unadjusted results’.

In July 2008, a new methodology for analysing critical illness experience was presented in CMI Working Paper 33.  This produces results that compare actual settled claims with expected settled claims, referred to as ‘adjusted results’. These results properly match claims to exposure, but are difficult to interpret particularly in terms of duration.

A special initiative to capture 2007-2011 data was launched in 2012, allowing offices to submit data in a flexible format.  The data, methodology and results are all described in CMI Working Paper 75.

Critical illness diagnosis rate tables

The first set of insured lives accelerated critical illness diagnosis rates, based on 1999-2004 data, were presented in CMI Working Paper 43.

CMI Working Paper 50 updated these to 2003-2006 experience and formally presented tables of rates known as AC04. It is anticipated that these will be introduced as a comparison basis in future results.

CMI Working Paper 52 presented cause-specific diagnosis rates, again based on 2003-2006 data, and

CMI Working Paper 58 describes supplementary analyses designed to aid understanding of the AC04 Series rates.

Related documents

Contact Details

If you have any questions about the CMI please email

info@cmilimited.co.uk

Filter or search events

Start date
E.g., 15/08/2022
End date
E.g., 15/08/2022

Events calendar

  • Spaces available

    The purpose of this research paper is to explore enterprise risk management lessons which can be learnt from the Covid-19 pandemic in preparation for potential future pandemics as well as other “gray rhino” or “black swan” events. This paper is not intended to be an all-encompassing solution to the issues presented by Covid-19; rather, the content has been provided to help drive discussions regarding how risk management processes may need to evolve in line with the dynamic nature of the underlying risks that they sometimes need to capture.

  • Spaces available

    This session is for new candidates and existing candidates where we will be discussing the practical steps you need to take leading up your exam and on the day. We will be discussing how to testing the online exam platform, downloading and uploading your paper and key information from the Exam Handbook.

    The exam webinar is for candidates, new to IFoA exams and returning candidates, sitting in the September 2022 exam session.

  • Spaces available

    The role of Non-Executive Directors has become increasingly challenging and critical over the past few years.

    Big picture thinking, Governance knowledge, Independent mindset, Ambassador potential and Energy and commitment: these are the essential skills sought in a successful NED, according to the Chartered Governance Institute (UK & Ireland).

    In parallel, Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) criteria are increasingly key and used by investors to measure the sustainability and ethical impact of investing in an organisation.

  • Spaces available

    This webinar will cover:

    • Some background on the risks of misselling in an ESG context, including the DWS case

    • Achieving positive impact is a strong antidote to the risks of greenwashing or ESG misselling, however this risks having a tension with fiduciary responsibilities

    • This tension can be resolved with a concept called Universal Ownership

    • Under Universal ownership, investors have an appetite to make a loss in order to achieve positive impact, and yet still have no compromise on their fiduciary responsibilities

  • Spaces available

    In the UK, the idea of collective defined contribution (CDC) pension schemes is gaining more attention with the launch of the Royal Mail CDC scheme, the first of its kind in the UK. Our recent research on CDC plans investigates the sources of the putative benefits of CDC schemes: the smoothing of pensions for members.  Using an attribution analysis to burrow into the scheme design, the reason for the smoothing of members' pensions is explained and understood.

  • Spaces available

    The IFoA's Infrastructure Working Party, led by Chris Lewin, will present its new introductory guide to infrastructure investment, which will be published on the IFoA web-site prior to the webinar.   Those readers whose institutions have already taken the plunge into infrastructure will know that it is a highly complex and diverse field of activity.   This guide does not explore all the matters which investors take into account, but it does discuss many of the more important points, including the risks and past returns, benchmarking, and ESG and SDG considerations.    Attendees will be invi

  • Social Care Agenda

    11 October 2022

    Spaces available

    Social care reform has long been on the to-do list for successive governments over the last two decades. In February, the government’s proposed reforms to adult social care [including cap on care costs] was published. Against this backdrop of funding promise and rising National Insurance taxation, in this session we will debate the resilience of these new proposals, the impact of future demand for care services and what role for the insurance industry and the important role it has played in long-term care funding in other countries where public-private partnership works.

  • Spaces available

    Health contributes to happiness at the personal, family, community and societal level.  Health, importantly underpins all our economic security. This talk will explore the drivers of our health, the measurement of health and the steps we can take to improve health – most of which lie outside the NHS.

  • GIRO Conference 2022

    ACC Liverpool  
    21 November 2022 - 23 November 2022
    Spaces available

    We are delighted to announce the return of GIRO as an in-person conference, giving you an opportunity to connect with actuaries in your practice area. Join leading experts to discuss key issues, emerging ideas, and new research across the General Insurance sector.

  • Life Conference 2022

    ACC Liverpool Kings Dock Liverpool Waterfront Liverpool Merseyside L3 4FP
    23 November 2022 - 25 November 2022
    Spaces available

    Life Conference returns as an in-person conference in 2022, giving you an opportunity to connect with your peers and fellow actuaries in your sector, in person. You will also hear leading experts discuss key issues, emerging ideas, and new research across the Life insurance sector.

  • Spaces available

    Mortality and morbidity risk varies by variables such as age, sex and smoking. In traditional actuarial experience analysis, these variables, and certain combinations thereof can be explored. However, with the wealth of data now available it is becoming increasingly challenging to identify the key drivers of experience and account for the interaction between different variables. A univariate approach often compares apples and pears, for example males are more likely to smoke and have larger policies than females. Likewise, variable interactions are missed unless specifically included.